2018
DOI: 10.1101/334748
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the archaeome: detection of archaeal signatures in the human body

Abstract: 15Due to their fundamentally different biology, archaea are consistently overlooked in conventional 16 microbiome surveys. Using amplicon sequencing, we evaluated methodological set-ups to detect 17 archaea in samples from five different body sites: respiratory tract (nose), digestive tract (mouth, 18 appendix, and stool) and skin. With the optimized protocols, the detection of archaeal ribosomal 19 sequence variants (RSVs) was increased from one (found in currently used, so-called "universal" 20 approach) to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Archaeal abundance in the human gut has been estimated previously, ranging from 0.1-21.3% [28,32]. Our abundance estimation did not vary significantly from those of previous studies, although the values were based on a relatively larger sample (n = 150), thereby enhancing the reliability of the estimation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). Archaeal abundance in the human gut has been estimated previously, ranging from 0.1-21.3% [28,32]. Our abundance estimation did not vary significantly from those of previous studies, although the values were based on a relatively larger sample (n = 150), thereby enhancing the reliability of the estimation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…S5 show weak (or no) relationship between archaeal abundances and host dietary factors. Next, we assessed whether these enterotypes are the results of more ancient features (such as host immune system and gut physiology) that might be derived before or during the diversification of the great ape species by comparing the Korean gut archaeome with other human gut archaeomes [26,28] and those of the great apes, including orangutan, gorilla, chimpanzee, and bonobo [29]. PCoA of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix showed the typical horseshoe shape of all merged samples (see Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Human Gut Archaeome With The Gut Archaeomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the human microbiome research investigating the archaeome (the archaeal portion of the human microbiome) focuses on the gut, where methanogens are the dominant archaea (Miller and Wolin, 1985;Dridi et al, 2009;Miragoli et al, 2017;Wampach et al, 2017). More recently, archaeal signatures have been detected in subgingival dental plaque, skin, lung, sinus and nares samples (Lepp et al, 2004;Dridi et al, 2011;Hulcr et al, 2012;Probst et al, 2013;Oh et al, 2014;Koskinen et al, 2017;Moissl-Eichinger et al, 2017;Pausan et al, 2018;Wagner Mackenzie et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have evaluated primer-pairs and data processing pipelines for targeting the archaeal component of the human microbiome for amplicon sequencing (Koskinen et al, 2017;Pausan et al, 2018). Studies by Pausan et al optimized the detection and quantification of archaea in a variety of samples from different sites, including swab samples from the upper nasal cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%