2019
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000919000175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the association of infant receptive language and pitch variability in fathers’ infant-directed speech

Abstract: The objective of this study was to examine the links between prosodic features of paternal Infant-Directed Speech (IDS) and child characteristics. Pitch variability measures were extracted from the speech samples of 50 fathers during unstructured play with their two-year-old children. Evidence for a link between child receptive language ability (measured by the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III) and fathers’ pitch variability was obtained from Multiple Hierarchical Regression. Findings support the hypoth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a recent study with 50 Irish-English speaking father-child dyads found that fathers' pitch variability is associated with children's receptive vocabulary, independent of child age, gender, and expressive language ability (Quigley et al, 2019). In the domain of lexical semantics, Majorano et al (2013) reported that Italian fathers' IDS noun frequency during free play at age two was significantly associated with their children's language production and comprehension at age three.…”
Section: Why Should We Study Paternal Ids?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a recent study with 50 Irish-English speaking father-child dyads found that fathers' pitch variability is associated with children's receptive vocabulary, independent of child age, gender, and expressive language ability (Quigley et al, 2019). In the domain of lexical semantics, Majorano et al (2013) reported that Italian fathers' IDS noun frequency during free play at age two was significantly associated with their children's language production and comprehension at age three.…”
Section: Why Should We Study Paternal Ids?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite parentese formerly being called motherese, fathers produce parentese cross-linguistically (Broesch & Bryant, 2018;Quigley et al, 2019; see also Saint-Georges et al, 2013), though they exhibit some prosodic differences from mothers (Fernald et al, 1989;Gergely et al, 2017;Warren-Leubecker & Bohannon, 1984). Nevertheless, the majority of the work on associations between parentese and child language has either not distinguished maternal and paternal parentese in their analyses (e.g., Ferjan Ramírez et al, 2018Ramírez et al, , 2020Ramírez-Esparza et al, 2014, 2017a, 2017b or has focused exclusively on mothers (e.g., Kuhl et al, 1997;Liu et al, 2003).…”
Section: Daylong Audio Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both maternal and paternal vocalisation behaviours are important for a range of offspring outcomes, including language (16,17), socio-emotional and cognitive development (16,18,19). For instance, frequency of maternal vocalisation has been found to be positively associated with cognitive development and educational attainment (20,21) and negatively associated with childhood psychopathology (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%