2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.88.052901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Barkas effect with keV-electron scattering

Abstract: The energy loss of fast ions at close collision is mainly due to electron-ion collisions. The electrons are approximately stationary and they collide with a fast-moving ion. Here we study the same collision experimentally, in a reference system where the ions (or atoms) are stationary and interacting with keV electrons. Scattering cross sections under these conditions deviate from Rutherford, and we link these deviations, at higher energies, to the Z 3 contributions to the electronic stopping and the related B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HfO 2 sample was a 60 nm thick HfO 2 layer grown by atomic layer deposition on a silicon wafer. Results of these films were published elsewhere; here, the focus is on the investigation of the influence of multiple scattering on the experiment, as well as an illustration of how ERBS can be used to determine the sample composition for a wide range of samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HfO 2 sample was a 60 nm thick HfO 2 layer grown by atomic layer deposition on a silicon wafer. Results of these films were published elsewhere; here, the focus is on the investigation of the influence of multiple scattering on the experiment, as well as an illustration of how ERBS can be used to determine the sample composition for a wide range of samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Hf, the partial‐wave cross section is substantially larger at backward angles than the Rutherford one. The cause of this is discussed elsewhere, and for Hf, the term ‘electron Rutherford backscattering’ is not strictly appropriate.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11]. While the validity of the approach has gradually been accepted, it is not clear whether, as implied by Lindhard, his approach covers the complete phenomenon or, as implied recently [17][18][19], that one deals with two independent mechanisms, one for distant collisions found by Ashley et al, and another one for close collisions found by Lindhard. This aspect will be studied here by comparing the distant-collision limit of Lindhard's approach to that of Ashley et al…”
Section: Binding Versus Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this feature is not mentioned in ref. [17], it may be the reason why Lindhard's procedure has been considered to concern only close collisions [17][18][19].…”
Section: Binding Versus Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation