1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb02374.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the benefits of a subjective approach in qualitative nursing research

Abstract: The increasing credibility of qualitative approaches for research in nursing has opened up new debates about methodology and rigour. Traditionally, qualitative methods have been scrutinized using some criteria that are more pertinent for quantitative research. The transition to a more subjective, reflexive approach to nursing research may be painful, but brings benefits. With the loss of scientific rigour comes the gain of eliciting true meaning, by recreating the experiences of others through co-operative enq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Qualitative research emphasizes the meaningfulness of the findings that are achieved by recognizing the subjective involvement of the researcher with the participants and its potential to generate more valid and meaningful information. 35…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Qualitative research emphasizes the meaningfulness of the findings that are achieved by recognizing the subjective involvement of the researcher with the participants and its potential to generate more valid and meaningful information. 35…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the selective coding process, both colleagues were given copies of coding exemplars and the original transcripts from which these were drawn. Peer verification as a method of ensuring rigor has been criticised by researchers [22,23] who stated that it is unlikely that two people will interpret data in the same way because the production of themes and categories depends upon the unique creative processes between the researcher and the data. Others argued that the process of verification encourages thoroughness, adding that whether this is carried out by a conscientious researcher, by a team or by experts is immaterial, what matters is that a systematic process was followed [24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth considering that there may be some truth in the argument that if the nurse researcher holds back then maybe the participant will hold back (Wilde, 1992;Schutz, 1994;Chesney, 2001;Carolan, 2003). After all, participants cannot be expected to give all the time.…”
Section: N U R S E R E S E a R C H E R R O L E C O N F L I C T A Solumentioning
confidence: 99%