Knowledge is known as awareness, personal knowing, and experience of governmental officials in doing jobs as well as in connecting to the colleges. Others consider knowledge the facts, laws, concepts, principles, casual relationships, insight, judgments and feelings (Ahmad & Daghfous, 2010). Knowledge often exists in each individual and knowledge which can only be used by that person is collected through the private absorption. Other people who want to use another's knowledge must be shared. Now, researchers indicate that the world is moving to knowledge economy in which economic resources are not only the machines but also knowledge. In developing and integrating time, beside technology and information technology, government officials in local areas can access and acquire knowledge quickly and flexibly. Whenever knowledge is easily shared from one to another person, working ability can arise and the results would be more effective. Knowledge sharing can also improve working skills of the officials (Widjaja, 2019). However, at the provincial level, a large number of officials have not been fully utilized and the policy makers have not put their attention on knowledge sharing to improving working performance. In literature, empirical studies which focus on knowledge sharing of local officials in Vietnam are relative rare. This paper will partly fulfill this gap in the literature and raise some policy implications for policy makers to consider related issues on knowledge sharing in local officials in Tien Giang province. The following section will present the literature review. Section 3 introduces the methodology. The section 4 is for empirical results while the section 5 will conclude the paper. 2. Literature Review The literature on knowledge sharing determinants is dominant in knowledge sharing research. Islam et al. (2011) examine the relationship between organizational cultural factors and knowledge sharing of service organizations in Bangladesh. This study finds that trust, communication between staff, and leadership have significantly positive impacts on knowledge sharing. However, reward system, on the other hand, does not significant impact on knowledge sharing. This result may contradictory to those previously (Al-Alawi et al., 2007; Ling et al, 2009). It may result from the reason that in Bangladesh employees do not want to share their knowledge because they are afraid of losing their jobs or of being replaced in service industry. It is also because of their low beliefs on the colleges. In other words, benefits of sharing knowledge may not cover its costs whenever the employees share all what they know. In another study, Kharabsheh et al. (2012) study the determinants of knowledge sharing in pharmaceutical firms in Jordan. The questionnaire has been done within 13 pharmaceutical firms in Jordan. There are six factors affecting knowledge sharing in this research, organizational culture, communication system, learning orientation, information technology, beliefs, and reward system. Among these determinant...