“…Studies increasingly have revealed how teaching language to talk about language (e.g., metalanguage) supports students’ awareness of the functions of academic language to facilitate text comprehension (e.g., Schleppegrell, 2013). Other studies have investigated how learners’ own metalanguage and metalanguage drawn from systemic functional linguistics (e.g., genre, passive voice) and literary criticism (e.g., terms from feminist literary or cultural studies) can be used to problematize, resist, and transform ways of using academic language (Harman & Khote, 2018; Phillips Galloway et al, 2020). In the example above, students made use of taught metalanguage (e.g., the phrase “authoritative perspective”) and student‐generated metalanguage (e.g., “givin’ impressions that you’re knowing something”).…”