2020
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2020.1860790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the emotional side of price fairness perceptions and its consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study considers the equity theory pertinent because the underlying focus of this research is PF. Also, several previous studies have employed the equity theory to investigate customer perceptions regarding price and PF (Malc et al, 2016(Malc et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study considers the equity theory pertinent because the underlying focus of this research is PF. Also, several previous studies have employed the equity theory to investigate customer perceptions regarding price and PF (Malc et al, 2016(Malc et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, prior equity theory-based research of pricing fairness perceptions has typically focused on one of two streams: either the identification of factors that influence PF perceptions (Bolton et al, 2003(Bolton et al, , 2010 or the consequences of PF perceptions (Martins and Monroe, 1994;Xia et al, 2004). Also, theory-based research of pricing fairness perceptions has tended to be conceptual in nature, direct relationship-focused, lacked empirical evidence and remained understudied (Malc et al, 2016(Malc et al, , 2020Martins and Monroe, 1994;Xia et al, 2004). In addition, according to the equity theory, indirect relationships also exist as significant influences on customer price fairness perceptions, and those indirect relationships would also appear to be likely sources of significant PF information and warrant further investigation (Martins and Monroe, 1994).…”
Section: Price Fairness In Fast-food Restaurantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evidence of this relationship has been indicated by Kalantaryan & Alessandrini (2020) when researching housing prices and the residential settlement of migrants in Italy. The cost of living in a destination country often appears as a factor of migration, especially for highly skilled individuals, as potential migrants may be unwilling to migrate to a host country with the high level of prices (European Commission, 2018a; Malc et al, 2021;Gavurova et al, 2020b). However, other research results have indicated that highly skilled migrants tend to locate closer to the city centre, demonstrating their adaptation to the increase in average housing prices as opposed to low-skilled migrants that tend to locate further away (Althobaiti et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The context dependence of the perceived fairness of prices has been a widely studied topic. Although fairness preferences are analytically separate from willingness to purchase and actual purchasing behavior, studies have found that a price increase that is perceived to be unfair reduces consumers' satisfaction (Herrmann et al, 2007) and willingness to purchase (Campbell, 1999;Huppertz et al, 1978;Konuk, 2018;Malc et al, 2020;Maxwell, 2002;Xia et al, 2004;Yen, 2019), and unfair pricing has been found to decrease real, as opposed to hypothetical, demand (Anderson and Simester, 2008;Sonnabend, 2016). Seminal papers by Kahneman et al (1986aKahneman et al ( , 1986b found that price increases involving consumer goods, wages, and rents were more likely to be found fair when the higher price was necessary to preserve a reference profit (and less likely to be fair when it took advantage of increased demand).…”
Section: Price Fairness and Emotional Antecedentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expanding on this conceptual framework, Malc et al. ( 2020 ) found a strong relationship between negative emotions induced by a price change (irritation, anger, discontent, and sadness) and perceptions of price fairness. Campbell ( 2007 ), studying the differential effects of human and non‐human sources of price information, found that human‐generated price increases led to significantly higher levels of negative affect compared with non‐human‐generated price increases.…”
Section: Price Fairness and Emotional Antecedentsmentioning
confidence: 99%