The Politics of Urban Sustainability Transitions 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781351065344-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the epistemic politics of urban niche experiments

Abstract: Urban experiments have been initiated in several locations to purposively initiate and shape transitions to more sustainable urban socio-technical systems, e.g. for energy, water, mobility. Although knowledges produced within such learning spaces are often presented as logical, technical and rational (Vanolo, 2013 ; Kitchin, 2014), the actors and mechanisms which shape decisions are far from obvious, involving cultures, power relations and multiple logics that are profoundly political (Machin, 2013). This rese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smart city projects are cross-sector projects which aim to create the conditions needed for smart city innovations and the existing sociotechnical configuration of local practices to mutually adapt. Smart city projects set in motion a dynamic learning environment, on-site experimentation with smart city innovations, institutional reconfiguration processes, and other complementary changes which support the wider adoption of smart city technologies and make it possible to solve issues of technical and social adaptation (Cohen et al, 2016;Cook et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Landscape-system-niche Connection In Smart City Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smart city projects are cross-sector projects which aim to create the conditions needed for smart city innovations and the existing sociotechnical configuration of local practices to mutually adapt. Smart city projects set in motion a dynamic learning environment, on-site experimentation with smart city innovations, institutional reconfiguration processes, and other complementary changes which support the wider adoption of smart city technologies and make it possible to solve issues of technical and social adaptation (Cohen et al, 2016;Cook et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Landscape-system-niche Connection In Smart City Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also pioneered self-build housing and low-carbon housing developments (PRP Architects 2010). As such, MK is open to new ideas and 'smart' is the latest in a long line of socio-technical developments to inflect developments in the city (Valdez et al 2018).…”
Section: Uncertainty and The Governance Of Smart City Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Funded by the UK government, and led by the Open University and MK Council, this project focused on the development of an urban platform built around a data hub and various 'apps' to augment infrastructure, such as transport, energy and water infrastructure. Finally, informed by the outcomes of the MK:Smart project, 'smart' is now focused in MK on aspects of the city where it closely aligns with governance and policy rationalities, such as transport planning (Cook et al 2018).…”
Section: Uncertainty and The Governance Of Smart City Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common characteristic of many smart cities programmes and projects is the reliance on experimentation to test new technologies in situ (Cook, Horne, Potter, & Valdez, 2018;Evans, Karvonen, & Raven, 2016;Karvonen, 2018). Lina Berglund-Snodgrass and Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren (2020) draw on neo-institutional theory to compare and contrast how the traditional 'public sector' logic of urban planning is influenced by an emerging 'experimental logic' that they characterise as 'testbed planning.'…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%