2023
DOI: 10.1177/08861099221134724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Experiences of Transgender & Nonbinary Individuals Working on Cisgender-Led Research Projects

Abstract: Transgender and nonbinary (TNB) individuals experience significant marginalization, including in the workplace and higher education. Although the number of TNB scholars and educators is growing, little attention has been given to the supervision of TNB individuals in research contexts. This lack of attention is particularly pronounced for TNB people working on trans-related research projects. Using intersectionality and queer theory, the present study examines the lived experiences of TNB individuals working o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we have found, creating an editorial (or research) team with trans representation may not always be achievable, or even realistic-the structural, social, and political barriers affecting trans people, as well as those who exist within academia generally, may render the list of potential trans collaborators or reviewers in one's professional network either tiny or nonexistent (and, as we have found, a cold-call email invitation from a relative stranger to take on unremunerated administration is, unsurprisingly, not entirely attractive). Related to this is the issue of tokenism-as Holloway et al (2023) find, some trans researchers felt they were included in research teams because of the PI's attempt to artificially lend legitimacy and external credibility to the project, instead of their expertise and skillset.…”
Section: Our Rolementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have found, creating an editorial (or research) team with trans representation may not always be achievable, or even realistic-the structural, social, and political barriers affecting trans people, as well as those who exist within academia generally, may render the list of potential trans collaborators or reviewers in one's professional network either tiny or nonexistent (and, as we have found, a cold-call email invitation from a relative stranger to take on unremunerated administration is, unsurprisingly, not entirely attractive). Related to this is the issue of tokenism-as Holloway et al (2023) find, some trans researchers felt they were included in research teams because of the PI's attempt to artificially lend legitimacy and external credibility to the project, instead of their expertise and skillset.…”
Section: Our Rolementioning
confidence: 99%