2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-021-10096-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Genetic and Environmental Etiologies of Phonological Awareness, Morphological Awareness, and Vocabulary Among Chinese–English Bilingual Children: The Moderating Role of Second Language Instruction

Abstract: This study investigated the associations among bilingual phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and vocabulary by focusing on their genetic and environmental etiologies. It also explored the influence of family socio-economic status (SES) and language exposure amount on the genetic and environmental effects. A twin study was conducted with 349 pairs of Chinese-English bilingual twins (mean age=7.37 years). Cross-language transfer was found in phonological and morphological awareness but not in vocabu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When looking at the growth predictors of phonic and phoneme awareness over a short period of teaching (10 weeks) the data showed that, in addition to the influence of task baseline performance, children from areas of lower deprivation, children who used a greater NDW in their story retells at baseline, and females showed the most growth. This is consistent with previous findings in the literature relating to the influences from socioeconomic status and English language exposure on phonological awareness and English vocabulary development for bilingual children [ 38 ]. The finding that females responded more positively than males is an interesting finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When looking at the growth predictors of phonic and phoneme awareness over a short period of teaching (10 weeks) the data showed that, in addition to the influence of task baseline performance, children from areas of lower deprivation, children who used a greater NDW in their story retells at baseline, and females showed the most growth. This is consistent with previous findings in the literature relating to the influences from socioeconomic status and English language exposure on phonological awareness and English vocabulary development for bilingual children [ 38 ]. The finding that females responded more positively than males is an interesting finding.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Multiple factors will influence their emergent literacy skills and literacy acquisition. These factors include children's executive functioning (e.g., short-term memory, self-regulation, planning skills) the linguistic similarities and differences between languages learned, children's self-efficacy, their family's socioeconomic status, their parents' level of education, their teacher's knowledge and experience with supporting bilingual learners, and the types of early literacy instruction they receive [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. In addition, their emergent literacy skills in areas such as phonological awareness [39], alphabetic knowledge, vocabulary, and oral narrative skills in their dominant language are all likely to influence achievement in literacy acquisition [30,32,38].…”
Section: Influences On Literacy Development For Bilingual Learnersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as reading-related linguistic skills, no studies have explored the possibility of phonological awareness and morphological awareness as endophenotypes. The heritability estimates of phonological awareness and morphological awareness were 0.19–0.83 [ 40 , 48 , 49 ] and 0.44–0.55 [ 50 ], respectively. Candidate gene studies have also discussed the association of KIAA0319 with phonological and morphological awareness [ 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When students learn English, they also tend to transition from listening to reading and writing, but in the actual English teaching, the proportion of listening teaching content is much lower compared with vocabulary, grammar and reading. At the same time, under the influence of test-taking philosophy, listening and speaking courses are often transformed into theoretical courses, and in this situation, listening and speaking is even the weak point of students in their learning [12][13]. Learning a language is about communication, and the purpose of English teaching is to develop students' ability to use this language for communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%