Exploring the Genomic Landscape of the GP63 family inTrypanosoma cruzi: Evolutionary Dynamics and Functional Peculiarities

Abstract

In the present work we analyzed the complete set of GP63 sequences from the parasitic protozoaTrypanosoma cruzi. Our analysis allowed us to refine annotation of sequences previously identified as functional and pseudogenes. Concerning the latter, we unified pseudogenic fragments derived from the same functional gene and excluded sequences incorrectly annotated as GP63 pseudogenes. We were able to identify eleven GP63 gene groups, which are sharply defined and have a high intra-group sequence identity. The sequences of each group showed a strong preference with genomic compartments, Some groups are located in the core and others in disruptive compartments of theT. cruzigenome. Groups located in the core compartment often contain tandem arrays of GP63 genes. On the contrary, genes from groups located in the disruptive compartment tend to be surrounded by genes encoding surface proteins such as MASP, mucins and trans-sialidases. Analysis of the immediate GP63 environments showed differences that may be the result of different genomic dynamics in these two compartments. Interestingly, each GP63 group showed a particular mRNA expression profile and some groups contain members that are differentially expressed between life cycle stages, being expressed at higher levels in trypomastigotes than in the replicative forms. This suggests that GP63 proteins may play a relevant role in the infective stage. The analysis of the M8 domain, that defines the GP63 protein family, allowed us to recognize that each group presented peculiarities in the conserved sites as well as in the presence of the predicted signal peptide and GPI anchor site. Phylogenetic analysis of the GP63 sequences, including other species of the genusTrypanosomaas well as other kinetoplastids, showed that ten of the 11 groups ofT. cruziare also present in the otherTrypanosomaspecies and are exclusive of genus, suggesting that the diversification of these subfamilies took place before speciation. However, each species then followed a different evolutionary path, amplifying specific groups in unique ways.Data summaryThe authors confirm all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files.