Exciton binding energy has been regarded as ac rucial parameter for mediating charge separation in polymeric photocatalysts.M inimizing the exciton binding energy of the polymers can increase the yield of charge-carrier generation and thus improve the photocatalytic activities,b ut the realization of this approach remains ag reat challenge. Herein, aseries of linear donor-acceptor conjugated polymers has been developed to minimizethe exciton binding energy by modulating the charge-transfer pathway. The results reveal that the reduced energy loss of the charge-transfer state can facilitate the electron transfer from donor to acceptor,a nd thus,m ore electrons are ready for subsequent reduction reactions.The optimizedpolymer,FSO-FS,exhibits aremarkable photochemical performance under visible light irradiation.Hydrogen evolution using nanoparticulate semiconductors has great potential for future green and sustainable fuel production from water and sunlight. [1, 2] Conjugated polymers (CPs), including carbon nitride, [3] COFs, [4] CTFs, [5] CMPs, [6] and linear polymers, [7] have recently emerged as anew family of semiconductor photocatalysts,o wing to their advantages, such as tunable structure and properties,e ase of fabrication, environmental friendliness,a nd absence of noble metals.T o date,c onsiderable advances have been achieved by rational design of the structure and by tailoring of the properties of the CPs. [8] Nevertheless,because of their undesirably high exciton binding energy (E b ,t ypically > 100 meV), [9] most of the polymeric photocatalysts show only moderate photocatalytic activities,p articularly in comparison with their inorganic counterparts.Recently,i nspired by the rapid charge transfer in donoracceptor (D-A) heterojunction based solar cells,such aD-A construction has also been applied to boost the charge mobility of conjugated polymeric photocatalysts by controlling the local structure of the polymers. [10] It is well established that in aD -A based CP,t he charges tend to spontaneously migrate to the acceptor because of the larger energy of the light-excited excitons (E exc )c ompared to those of the charge transfer (CT) state (E CT )a nd E LUMO of the acceptor (see Scheme 1a). [11] Clearly,the overall amount of charge arriving Supportinginformation and the ORCID identification number(s) for the author(s) of this article can be found under: https://doi.