2016
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1162836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the hidden influence of international treaty secretariats: using social network analysis to analyse the Twitter debate on the ‘Lima Work Programme on Gender’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These positions allow them to increase their impact on the information diffusion in the network. This is in line with findings from studies investigating the UNFCCC Twitter network, which showed that the convention's secretariat has a particularly influential role (Kolleck et al 2017;Jörgens, Kolleck, and Saerbeck 2016).…”
Section: [Insert Table 3] Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These positions allow them to increase their impact on the information diffusion in the network. This is in line with findings from studies investigating the UNFCCC Twitter network, which showed that the convention's secretariat has a particularly influential role (Kolleck et al 2017;Jörgens, Kolleck, and Saerbeck 2016).…”
Section: [Insert Table 3] Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The main idea is that social systems are 'networks through which information (or any resource) flows from node to node along paths consisting of ties interlocked through shared endpoints' (Borgatti and Lopez-Kidwell 2011, 43). A social network perspective shifts the unit of analysis from individual actors towards the relations between them and the overall network these relations constitute (Jörgens, Kolleck, and Saerbeck 2016). The examination of relations can lead to the identification of particularly central and, possibly, influential actors within a network as inferred from their relative position to others (Kolleck 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the ability of ideational bureaucracies to influence policy outputs is contingent on their ability to persuade member states in the legislative and executive organs of the IGO. Thus, the relative position of an ideational bureaucracy in issue‐specific communication networks (Jörgens et al ) and the ‘epistemic community’ (Haas , p. 2) is highly relevant. Once the member states have decided to delegate executive tasks to an ideational bureaucracy (for the various reasons outlined by Hawkins et al , pp.…”
Section: Developing An Ideal Typology Of Ipas’ Autonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Networks are a way of thinking about social systems that focus our attention on the relationships among the entities that make up the system" (Borgatti et al, 2018, p. 2). The main idea of analyzing social networks is to shift the focus from attributional information to the relational aspects of the researched subjects, that is, the way they are embedded in a network (Wassermann and Faust, 1994;Jörgens et al, 2016). This approach contrasts with more traditional methods of social sciences, such as interviews or surveys, and can therefore provide a different type of information.…”
Section: Methodological Approach and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%