2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06617-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the impact of exercise and mind–body prehabilitation interventions on physical and psychological outcomes in women undergoing breast cancer surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide variety of prehabilitation interventions were completed for the included studies, as described in Table 3. For the selected studies, the majority completed exercise programs [37,38,40,43,49] or had a component of exercise [39,42,48], with two studies focusing on upper limb exercise speci cally [37,38]. An additional two focused on smoking cessation [46,47], with a single study reporting on multi-modal prehabilitation [49], and a range of complementary and alternative therapies [ Group 1 (in person teaching): Received an information sheet with exercises, video links and instruction with physical demonstration performed by the research team.…”
Section: Quality Appraisal Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A wide variety of prehabilitation interventions were completed for the included studies, as described in Table 3. For the selected studies, the majority completed exercise programs [37,38,40,43,49] or had a component of exercise [39,42,48], with two studies focusing on upper limb exercise speci cally [37,38]. An additional two focused on smoking cessation [46,47], with a single study reporting on multi-modal prehabilitation [49], and a range of complementary and alternative therapies [ Group 1 (in person teaching): Received an information sheet with exercises, video links and instruction with physical demonstration performed by the research team.…”
Section: Quality Appraisal Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the quantitative studies, all groups were found to be comparable at baseline, and the reported outcome data was complete. An unclear bias risk was observed for some RCTs for outcome assessors being blinded to the intervention provided [40,41,44], and for participants adhering to the assigned interventions [45,47], where this information was not described within the articles. Further, unclear bias was reported for all non-randomised quantitative studies [37,42,43,48,49] due to no discussion of accounting of confounders in the study design.…”
Section: Quality Appraisal Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations