“…In the field of elearning, TAM could not only be used for predicting adoption behavior, but also for measuring the learning satisfaction, continuous intention to use e-learning (Pereira, Ramos, Gouvêa, & Costa, 2015), loyalty to elearning (Sánchez-Franco, Peral-Peral, & Villarejo-Ramos, 2014), course outcomes, and academic performance using e-learning (Arbaugh, 2014). The features of technology: interactivity, personalisation, accessibility, mobility, and the choice of media to present the contents (Agudo-Peregrina, Hernández-García, & Pascual-Miguel, 2014); individual characteristics such as personal innovativeness in information technology, computer self-efficacy, and demographic variables (Chow et al, 2013;Thatcher & Perrewe, 2002);the course characteristics of learning resources, course content, tutor quality, and course quality (Persico, Manca, & Pozzi, 2014;Teo, 2014); and other variables such as social influence (or social norm) and flow (Wu & Zhang, 2014), are incorporated into TAM to enhance the understanding of adopting. In summary, TAM has been widely used in predicting e-learning adoption and proved to be robust.…”