2023
DOI: 10.1177/07356331221136888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Learning Process and Effectiveness of STEM Education via Learning Behavior Analysis and the Interactive-Constructive- Active-Passive Framework

Abstract: Given the inadequacy of assessed outcomes (e.g., final exam) and the importance of evaluating the learning process in STEM education, we use deep learning to develop the STEM learning behavior analysis system (SLBAS) to assess the behavior of learners in STEM education. We map learner behavior to the ICAP (interactive, constructive, active, passive) framework, helping instructors to better understand the learning process of learners. The results show that SLBAS exhibits high accuracy. Moreover, Cohen’s kappa c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The platform's design requires more intensive student interaction, reflecting the "learning-by-doing" pedagogy that is vital in higher learning environments. Students in these settings must not only understand theoretical concepts but also apply them in practical scenarios (Lee et al, 2023a(Lee et al, , 2023bLee et al, 2023aLee et al, , 2023bWu et al, 2023b). This is consistent with the findings of Dellatola et al (2020) and Kuo et al (2020), who reported that active engagement practices, such as collaborative problem-solving and peer feedback, improved students' learning outcomes and satisfaction in blended learning courses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The platform's design requires more intensive student interaction, reflecting the "learning-by-doing" pedagogy that is vital in higher learning environments. Students in these settings must not only understand theoretical concepts but also apply them in practical scenarios (Lee et al, 2023a(Lee et al, , 2023bLee et al, 2023aLee et al, , 2023bWu et al, 2023b). This is consistent with the findings of Dellatola et al (2020) and Kuo et al (2020), who reported that active engagement practices, such as collaborative problem-solving and peer feedback, improved students' learning outcomes and satisfaction in blended learning courses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Based on the assumptions of the engagement model, the passive state refers to classroom situations where students quietly assimilate information and knowledge, but with little behavioral engagement with the learning experience (Lee et al, 2023). These students are more likely to direct their attention to the lesson content but less likely to engage in off-point discussion, take important notes, or contribute to dialogue (Chi et al, 2014;Michel et al, 2009;Russell, 2021).…”
Section: Behavioral Probabilities and Frame Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hands-on learning is known for significantly enhancing learning engagement (Lee et al, 2023a; May et al, 2023). It spurs interest and motivation, providing richer learning experiences than conventional teaching methods and improving outcomes (Chen et al, 2020a).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%