2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12103-012-9188-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Link between Mentoring Program Structure & Success Rates: Results from a National Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The purpose of this study was to examine youths' perceptions of the influence that participating (DeWit et al, 2016;Dubois et al, 2002;Grossman & Garry, 1997;Matz, 2014;Miller, Barnes, Miller, & McKinnon, 2013). The results of this study are also consistent with the known protective factors for preventing continued delinquency (Haegerich & Tolan, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The purpose of this study was to examine youths' perceptions of the influence that participating (DeWit et al, 2016;Dubois et al, 2002;Grossman & Garry, 1997;Matz, 2014;Miller, Barnes, Miller, & McKinnon, 2013). The results of this study are also consistent with the known protective factors for preventing continued delinquency (Haegerich & Tolan, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Evidence-based best practices suggest that children benefit most with at minimum six months of social intervention and, for greatest impact, at least a full year or more of the mentoring relationship (Grossman 2005). For social intervention through mentoring to have a lasting impact on the life of a child, programs need to support relationships of trust lasting at least six months and ideally one year or more (Miller et al 2013; Roberts et al 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings may reflect the efficacy of the program in the study setting. The effect of the BBBS program as a whole for CIP is largely unknown (Bruster and Foreman 2012; Jarjoura et al 2013; Miller et al 2013). Nonetheless, these findings are useful as an indicator of the efficacy of social intervention under the condition of the study setting.…”
Section: Limitations and Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the numerous difficulties faced by young people transitioning from juvenile justice centres to the community, it is not surprising that transitional planning and services are recognised (Clinkinbeard and Zohra, 2012) as critical for increasing the likelihood that young offenders will reintegrate successfully into society. From a range of re-entry services that may enhance the rehabilitative prospects of young offenders, mentoring is emerging as one of the most widely utilised approaches (Blechman and Bopp, 2005; Miller et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Psychosocial and instrumental support offered by a mentor may counterbalance some of the negative social-contextual conditions (e.g. dysfunctional family relationship, anti-social peer groups) that impact young offenders (Miller et al, 2013). As an example, mentors may be able to act as intermediaries in situations in which there are strained relationships between young offenders and their families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%