2017
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2017.1348495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the mediating role of innovation in the effect of the knowledge management process on performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
5
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to our findings, knowledge management processes affect innovation, improving overall organizational performance, which agrees with the conclusions of Durmuş-Özdemir and Abdukhoshimov [101]. Sharing information and innovating go hand in hand and help organizations to keep up with the market [102].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…According to our findings, knowledge management processes affect innovation, improving overall organizational performance, which agrees with the conclusions of Durmuş-Özdemir and Abdukhoshimov [101]. Sharing information and innovating go hand in hand and help organizations to keep up with the market [102].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We diverge from these studies by focussing on the influence of KMPs on organizational performance because it is considered as the more global measure of an organization’s success and achievements (Yeung et al , 2003; Migdadi et al , 2017). Furthermore, we examine this influence in the particular context of privately owned firms because research into the effects of KMPs on the organizational performance of privately-owned organizations is limited (Ali et al , 2010; Daud and Yusoff, 2011; Mills and Smith, 2011; Jayasingam et al , 2013; Ahmed et al , 2015; Tubigi and Alshawi, 2015; Migdadi et al , 2017; Durmuş-Özdemir and Abdukhoshimov, 2018; Dzenopoljac et al , 2018) and has reported inconsistent findings. For instance, while some scholars have found a positive association between knowledge creation (Tubigi and Alshawi, 2015; Migdadi et al , 2017), knowledge acquisition (Ali et al , 2010; Daud and Yusoff, 2011; Mills and Smith, 2011; Ahmed et al , 2015; Tubigi and Alshawi, 2015), KS (Ali et al , 2010; Dzenopoljac et al , 2018), KA (Daud and Yusoff, 2011; Mills and Smith, 2011; Ahmed et al , 2015) and KT (Tubigi and Alshawi, 2015; Dzenopoljac et al , 2018) and firm performance, others have found no significant association between external knowledge acquisition (Migdadi et al , 2017), KS (Migdadi et al , 2017), KT (Durmuş-Özdemir and Abdukhoshimov, 2018) and firm performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firsly, it analyzes the complexity of the KMP – performance link in SMEs by decomposing KMP into its principal types or dimensions, thus responding to calls for further research on the consequences of different KMPs (Durst and Edvardsson, 2012; Cerchione et al , 2016; Massaro et al , 2016). Secondly, this work meets the demand for a more in-depth examination of the mechanisms through which different types of KMPs influence performance (Cerchione et al , 2016; Migdadi et al , 2017¸ Durmuş-Özdemir and Abdukhoshimov, 2018). Specifically, it provides pioneering empirical evidence that OL mediates the relationships between some types of KMPs and organizational performance, thereby complementing and expanding upon papers by Ngah et al (2016) and Rehman et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fourth, the technical mechanism positively affects knowledge application capability, which, in turn, has a positive impact on the innovation performance of enterprises. As a dynamic capability, knowledge management ability helps enterprises to continuously update specific resources and enhance certain capabilities, indirectly affecting their innovation performance by influencing their strategic configuration [67]. The companies' knowledge management capabilities affect their problem-solving mechanism and speed of resolution [68].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%