2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2008.04.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the minimal structure in prepositional phrase attachment ambiguities: Evidence from Greek

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 However, the observation of argument/modifier asymmetries in PP ambiguity resolution (e.g., Schütze and Gibson, 1999) suggests that the application of Minimal Attachment may be restricted (Frazier and Clifton, 1996) or that other grammatical constraints may be involved (see, e.g., Crocker, 1996;Phillips, 1996). Other factors that have been found to affect comprehenders' PP disambiguation preferences include the definiteness of the postverbal NP (Spivey-Knowlton and Sedivy, 1995) and the choice of preposition (Katsika, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, the observation of argument/modifier asymmetries in PP ambiguity resolution (e.g., Schütze and Gibson, 1999) suggests that the application of Minimal Attachment may be restricted (Frazier and Clifton, 1996) or that other grammatical constraints may be involved (see, e.g., Crocker, 1996;Phillips, 1996). Other factors that have been found to affect comprehenders' PP disambiguation preferences include the definiteness of the postverbal NP (Spivey-Knowlton and Sedivy, 1995) and the choice of preposition (Katsika, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%