“…The purpose of the present study was to develop a dynamic model capable of accounting for the two main determinants of creativity (i.e., divergent and convergent thinking), and to use the model to compare the impacts of two common educational policies (i.e., offering scholarships vs. curriculum development) on the happiness gained from creativity in the healthy general population. In this research, I will not attempt to account for gender differences (Abraham et al, 2014;Tarasova et al, 2010b; or specific tasks such as musical improvisation (Berkowitz & Ansari, 2010), freestyle rap (Liu et al, 2012), verbal creativity (Benedek et al, 2014a;Green et al, 2012;Rodionov, 2013;Vartanian, 2012;Zhu et al, 2013), creative writing (Shah et al, 2013), or figural (e.g., artistic) creativity (Aziz-Zadeh et al, 2013;Duff et al, 2013;Gansler et al, 2011;Heilman & Acosta, 2013;Huang et al, 2013). Moreover, I will not consider creativity as a therapy for unhealthy people who are affected by autism, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy (Schott, 2012), psychopathology (Jung et al, 2010a, brain lesions (Abraham et al, 2012aShamay-Tsoory et al, 2011), bipolar disorder (Ricciardiello & Fornaro, 2013), schizophrenic thoughts (Fink et al, 2014), mood disorders or dementia (De Souza et al, 2010), or brain lesions (Barbey et al, 2013).…”