2021
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.22078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the pandemic's potential effects on workers' collectivist values, prosocial behaviors, and attitudes toward mistreatment

Abstract: The global COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally changed the way we live and work in the short-term, but history suggests that the crisis may also exert deeper, longerlasting effects. With the aim of providing preliminary insight into this possibility, we theoretically construct and empirically test hypotheses for how exposure to COVID-19 stimuli (e.g., reading or watching media coverage, observing relief efforts) relates to the deep-seated values that guide workers' attitudes and behaviors. Specifically, we bui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is not just a stressor for a few but most employees (Yan et al, 2021). In the COVID‐19 context, workers become anxious and depressed when they do not exactly know which actual risks they may get because COVID‐19 is a mostly uncontrollable and unpredictable global crisis with continuing changes and causes shifts in individuals' deep‐level values (Dryhurst et al, 2020; Li et al, 2021). Furthermore, prior studies have highlighted the importance of researching the effects of the perceived health risks of a pandemic on employees in various settings, such as in the hotel industry (Vo‐Thanh et al, 2021a, 2021b) and the healthcare sector (Deressa et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is not just a stressor for a few but most employees (Yan et al, 2021). In the COVID‐19 context, workers become anxious and depressed when they do not exactly know which actual risks they may get because COVID‐19 is a mostly uncontrollable and unpredictable global crisis with continuing changes and causes shifts in individuals' deep‐level values (Dryhurst et al, 2020; Li et al, 2021). Furthermore, prior studies have highlighted the importance of researching the effects of the perceived health risks of a pandemic on employees in various settings, such as in the hotel industry (Vo‐Thanh et al, 2021a, 2021b) and the healthcare sector (Deressa et al, 2021).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The items were rated on a five‐point scale ranging from one (totally disagree) to five (totally agree) for CV19PHR, PWSPs, mindfulness, and JP and from one (never) to five (very often) for burnout. We also added eight control variables, including demographic variables (age, gender), job‐related variables (seniority, contract type, working mode change), and organization‐related variables (ownership, organizational size, type of industry) to examine how they could affect dependent variable because previous studies have linked these variables to employee work outcomes (Lee, 2021; Li et al, 2021; Mihalache & Mihalache, 2021; Sasaki et al, 2020; Yuan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Overview Of the Three Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Work on this conceptualisation of sustainable care systems began before the Covid-19 pandemic, which has highlighted inequalities in our care systems that could be better understood, and perhaps improved or rectified, if this model of a sustainable care system was applied to rethink how people and environmental care is supported in our society. In early stages of the pandemic when many countries globally were restricting movement and travel, through increased pro-social behaviours (Li et al, 2021), there were reports of increased bird life in urban areas and less pollution in waterways. However, these positives sit alongside increasing inequalities in society caused by the pandemic, and society's response to it.…”
Section: Future Research Agendamentioning
confidence: 99%