2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the planetary boundary for chemical pollution

Abstract: (323 words)36 Rockström et al. (2009aRockström et al. ( , 2009b have warned that humanity must reduce anthropogenic impacts 37 defined by nine planetary boundaries if "unacceptable global change" is to be avoided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
95
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, simply considering the masses of chemical emissions can be very misleading since mass is not an adequate proxy of (eco)toxicity impacts, see e.g., Nordborg et al (2014). It should be noted that mass-based indicators of chemical pollution are indicators of pressure, while impact potentials based on USEtox are indicators of impact, in the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework (see e.g., Diamond et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, simply considering the masses of chemical emissions can be very misleading since mass is not an adequate proxy of (eco)toxicity impacts, see e.g., Nordborg et al (2014). It should be noted that mass-based indicators of chemical pollution are indicators of pressure, while impact potentials based on USEtox are indicators of impact, in the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework (see e.g., Diamond et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should however be noted that other indicators of chemical pollution might also be of interest, e.g., the number of commercially available chemicals, or the annual emissions of single, groups of, or all chemicals. For more examples of indicators of chemical drivers, pressures, state and impacts, see Diamond et al (2015).…”
Section: Contents Lists Available At Sciencedirectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species and ecosystems are exposed to mixtures of chemicals which can act additively, synergistically or antagonistically on species and ecosystems [93]. Persson et al [84], MacLeod et al [94] and Diamond et al [95] highlighted some of the key scientific challenges of establishing a planetary boundary for chemical pollution, including the large number of commercial chemicals, the diversity of associated life cycles, and the complex linkages between emissions, exposure and adverse effects across species, ecosystems, and possibly planetary-scale processes. Simple life cycle based comparative chemical screening tools, such as GreenScreen [96] do not address actual environmental burdens nor the ecotoxicity boundary.…”
Section: Defining and Measuring The Safe Operating Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to communicate the results of this approach, to cater for the learning process of the stakeholders and end users during the development, and to heighten the acceptability of the final DSS (Salewicz and Nakayama, 2004; Wassen et al, 2011). Finally, it is crucial to design a DSS that can be further developed (Newman et al, 1999), as the subject of CECs is continuously developing (Diamond et al, 2015) and a CEC DSS will quickly become outdated or obsolete. Table 2 summarises the design criteria for the tDSS.…”
Section: Tdss Design Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%