Exploring the potential for a new measure of socioeconomic deprivation status to monitor health inequality

Abstract

Background Monitoring health inequalities is an important task for health research and policy, to uncover who is being left behind – and where – and to inform effective and equitable policies and programmes to tackle existing inequities. The choice of which measure to use to monitor and analyse health inequalities is thereby not trivial. This article explores a new measure of socioeconomic deprivation status (SDS) to monitor health inequalities. Methods The SDS measure was constructed using the Alkire-Foster method. It includes eight indicators across two equally weighted dimensions (education and living standards) and specifies a four-level gradient of socioeconomic deprivation at the household-level. We conducted four exercises to examine the value-added of the proposed SDS measure, using Demographic and Health Surveys data. First, we examined the discriminatory power of the new measure when applied to outcomes in four select reproductive, maternal, neonatal, and child health (RMNCH) indicators across six countries: skilled birth attendance, stunting, U5MR, and DTP3 immunisation. Then, we analysed the behaviour and association of the new SDS measure vis-à-vis the DHS Wealth Index, including chi-squared test and Pearson correlation coefficient. Third, we analysed the robustness of the SDS measure results to changes in its structure, using pairwise comparisons and Kendal Tau-b rank correlation. Finally, we illustrated some of the advantageous properties of the new measure, disaggregation and decomposition, on Haitian data. Results 1) Higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation are generally consistently associated with lower levels of achievements in the RMNCH indicators across countries. 2) 87% of all pairwise rank comparisons across a range of SDS measure structures were robust. 3) SDS and DHS Wealth Index are associated, but with considerable cross-country variation, highlighting their complementarity. 4) Haitian households in rural areas experienced, on average, more severe socioeconomic deprivation as well as lower levels of RMNCH achievement than urban households. Conclusions The proposed SDS measure adds analytical possibilities to the health inequality monitoring literature, in line with ethically and conceptually well-founded notions of absolute, multidimensional disadvantage. In addition, it allows for breakdown by its dimensions and components, which may facilitate nuanced analyses of health inequality, its correlates, and determinants.

Evaluation of a participatory approach to stratifying neighbourhoods across the Tanzanian city of Dar es Salaam in terms of income by comparing with latent profile analysis of deprivation based on national census data

“…Based on considerations of the relevant methodological literature (Box 2), the current study sought to assess a subjective participatory stratification approach (PSA) to classifying neighbourhoods in terms of income level by comparing it with an objective statistical approach using latent profile analysis (LPA), to stratify neighbourhoods in terms of deprivation based on socioeconomic data from the 2012 PHC in the Tanzania city of Dar es Salaam. While the income which is referred by the PSA is inherently subjective and based on the lived experiences and knowledge of the city's residents, the LPA of deprivation strata in quantitative terms is a more objective socioeconomic metric derived from formal ways of living standards, conditions, and education at the neighbourhood level [34].…”

Monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in health in Hong Kong: insights and lessons from the UK and Australia

“…The choice and consistency in the use of equity stratifiers are important for health inequality monitoring, which have been an active research area in recent years. 55 , 56 Ideally, equity stratifiers that are common between countries have an advantage of enabling comparison, a potentially important factor in motivating improvements. Such indicators should reflect the fundamental causes of poor health, be easy to understand by the lay public, and imply potential policy entry points.…”

A Systematic Review of Multidimensional Urban Poverty and Deprivation Indicators

“…This domain encompasses the indicators of social relationships which include family, friends and relatives' interactions and the benefit from their support, safety which focuses on perception of safety in the living neighborhood, also going on holiday, spending leisure time etc. (Dirksen, et al, 2022).…”