2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19074062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Potential of a School-Based Online Health and Wellbeing Screening Tool: Young People’s Perspectives

Abstract: Despite high levels of need, many young people who experience health issues do not seek, access or receive support. Between May and November 2021, using semi-structured interviews, we explored the perspectives of 51 young people (aged 13–14) from two schools who had taken part in a novel online health and wellbeing screening programme, the Digital Health Contact (DHC). One school delivered the DHC during home-learning due to COVID-19 restrictions, whilst the other delivered it in school when restrictions were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports our qualitative findings, which suggested that PHN(SN) found the workload associated with the DHC manageable because of its structured and planned nature, as well a meaningful part of their role [16]. In addition, the DHC was perceived as an acceptable and useful approach to identifying unmet health needs by adolescents and school stakeholders taking part [16,17]. Previous research suggests that although teachers may be able to identify and refer pupils who externally express signs of poor mental health through behavioural problems, this is much more difficult for pupils whose mental health problems are more internalized (e.g., emotional problems) [22,23].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This supports our qualitative findings, which suggested that PHN(SN) found the workload associated with the DHC manageable because of its structured and planned nature, as well a meaningful part of their role [16]. In addition, the DHC was perceived as an acceptable and useful approach to identifying unmet health needs by adolescents and school stakeholders taking part [16,17]. Previous research suggests that although teachers may be able to identify and refer pupils who externally express signs of poor mental health through behavioural problems, this is much more difficult for pupils whose mental health problems are more internalized (e.g., emotional problems) [22,23].…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is the first study to quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of a locally commissioned, digital, health and wellbeing screening tool for schools in the UK, as part of a larger mixed-methods evaluation [16,17]. Research calls for improved school-based interventions to prevent…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the main challenges of the strategy was to reach as many vulnerable people of different ages as possible, as has been done in similar studies and interventions [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], but at the same time minimizing the technological gap that could leave someone behind, which is a common problem when trying to reach a vulnerable population using information technologies [ 9 , 26 , 27 ]. To do this, everyday technology tools already existing in homes, such as tablets and smartphones, were used, with no need for additional installation of complex programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should also point out that children's health is not restricted to physical health only since mental health is crucial in their overall well-being, as stated by the WHO definition of health [7]. Over the past decade, increasing rates of mental health issues among young people have been observed [8], and early childhood adversities, such as abuse or neglect, have been implicated in lasting consequences and health modifications [9]. Therefore, the first step in providing targeted support for children at risk and their caretakers could be screening for exposure to those childhood experiences, protective factors, and effects of a toxic stress response [9].…”
Section: Introduction 1backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%