“…Moineau, Dronkers, & Bates, 2005;Utman, Blumstein, & Sullivan, 2001), or from studies in which TMS is used to transiently interfere with neural processes in motor regions (D'Ausilio, 2007;Meister, Wilson, Deblieck, Wu, & Iacoboni, 2007;Mottonen & Watkins, 2009). We note with interest, however, that all these studies show modulation of perception of speech that has been degraded*either by artificial speech manipulations (D'Ausilio, 2007;Meister et al, 2007;Moineau et al, 2005) or by the use of phonemically ambiguous materials (Mottonen & Watkins, 2009;Utman et al, 2001). These studies, therefore, converge with our fMRI work in suggesting that motor responses to speech are more likely of functional significance in listening situations in which the perception of speech is challenged by noise or phonetic ambiguity.…”