2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the relation between socio-economic status and reading achievement in PISA 2009 through an intercepts-and-slopes-as-outcomes paradigm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…At school-level, private schools scored higher in reading literacy. This finding is consistent with other studies conducted on the effects of school type on students' achievements (Jehangir, Glas, & van den Berg, 2015). Not a surprising result to the context of Jordan (this is also applicable to many other countries in the region).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…At school-level, private schools scored higher in reading literacy. This finding is consistent with other studies conducted on the effects of school type on students' achievements (Jehangir, Glas, & van den Berg, 2015). Not a surprising result to the context of Jordan (this is also applicable to many other countries in the region).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this model, about 41 per cent of the variance was attributed to between-school differences and 59 per cent to within-school differences. This means that apart from the student characteristics that shaped mathematics achievement, there was a sizeable portion of the total variance in mathematics achievement at the school level, something that many authors have previously stressed, suggesting remarkable differences in students' performance between schools (Jehangir et al, 2015;Martins & Veiga, 2010).…”
Section: Interpretation Of the Final Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, when SES is evaluated at school-level, results should not be interpreted as if they represented individual SES, hence measures should be taken to avoid an ecological fallacy, the transfer of individual-level inferences to the school-level, assuming that findings at the individual-level can depict between-school relationships (Jehangir, Glas, & van den Berg, 2015;Sirin, 2005). For the purposes of this study, multilevel analysis is used, because it can simultaneously estimate the complexity of student-and school-level effects, thereby preventing this ecological fallacy (Jehangir et al, 2015;Snijders & Bosker, 2012).…”
Section: Ses At the School Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include studies from the US (Alexander & Aaron, 1985;Gamoran, 1996;Levin, 1998;C. Lubienski & Lubienski, 2014; S. T. Lubienski & Lubienski, 2006;Witte, 1992Witte, , 1998, the UK (Gorard, 2006), as well as cross-national studies (Benito et al, 2014;Jehangir, Glas, & van den Berg, 2015;Mostafa, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%