2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Relation between Time on Task and Ability in Complex Problem Solving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
38
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous research, we found that process-oriented measures are dependent on task characteristics and do not show a unilateral relationship with performance (Goldhammer et al, 2014;Scherer et al, 2015). While process measures may provide additional information for the more difficult items, their relationship with easier items is unclear.…”
Section: Process-oriented Measurementsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line with previous research, we found that process-oriented measures are dependent on task characteristics and do not show a unilateral relationship with performance (Goldhammer et al, 2014;Scherer et al, 2015). While process measures may provide additional information for the more difficult items, their relationship with easier items is unclear.…”
Section: Process-oriented Measurementsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The study sought to study the relationship between the process measures, task identity, previous ability, and performance on the tangible series completion task. As was found with the relationship between time measures and performance (Goldhammer et al, 2014;Scherer et al, 2015), we expected this relationship to be complex and interactive.…”
Section: Aims and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyzing the behavioral patterns that individuals engage in when dealing with CPS tasks provides insights that go beyond mere final outcome scores and provides access to aspects of the cognitive process underlying specific problem solving behavior. Such in-depth log-file analyses have become technically feasible for CPS research (Scherer, Greiff, & Hautamäki, 2015) and could be extended to intelligence testing (Kröner, 2001) in which the possibilities of computer-based assessment such as log-file data are not fully used yet (Becker, Preckel, Karbach, Raffel, & Spinath, 2015). Getting access to the behaviors displayed and strategies employed by participants in assessments of intelligence could lead to a more thorough understanding of not only the assessment instruments themselves but more importantly of the whole construct of intelligence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates that self-monitoring and reasoning are core components that are necessary for making a person a good complex problem solver. An interesting open question that remains is whether other, more distal constructs than those investigated here may demonstrate an interplay with performance judgments to explain performance in CPS (e.g., mastery orientation; Scherer, Greiff, & Hautamäki, 2015).…”
Section: Confidence In Cps Is Linked To Cps Beyond Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 97%