Exploring the relationship between military spending and human rights performance in South Asia

Abstract

The relationship between military spending and human rights is one of the most prominent issues in political economy. Yet, the linkage between the two is empirically under-developed. We examine the effects of militarisation on human rights performance in six South Asian economies for the period 1980-2006. Our findings demonstrate that an increase in military spending significantly reduces human rights. Acceleration of military spending is also associated with decline in human rights performance. By gauging the effect of military spending on human rights conditions during war and peace years, we found that irrespective of war or peace years, any increase in military spending is detrimental to human rights conditions. Further, we find that the negative impact of military spending on human rights is conditioned by increase in neighbours' military spending.Given the wide range of socioeconomic and political problems ailing South Asian countries, these results gain significant importance. The study suggests that reduction in military spending could help reallocate the resources to productive purposes, thereby paving way for development and progress. This could reduce social unrest and economic insecurity, thereby increasing government's respect for human rights.

Determinants of foreign direct investment in Sri Lanka

“…Therefore, investors are reluctant to invest in countries where the economies are not stable. This has been confirmed by some other studies (Vadlamannati, 2008;Mohamed et al, 2010).The results confirm the Proposition 4. Relationship of FDI with lending interest rates shows a significant negative relationship.…”

“…Therefore, high government consumption expenditure is assumed as an indicator of macroeconomic instability. Negative fiscal impacts crowd out foreign investments and hamper the prospects of socio-economic development (Vadlamannati, 2008). Some studies have found that FDI has a negative relationship with government consumption expenditure (Mohamed et al, 2010;Yang et al, 2000).…”

A Warrior Society: Data From 30 Countries Show That Belief in a Zero-Sum Game Is Related to Military Expenditure and Low Civil Liberties

“…Also, the relationship between military spending and human rights is one of the most prominent issues in political economics. There is some evidence that an increase in military spending significantly reduces human rights (e.g., Vadlamannati and Pathmalal, 2008). With respect to institutional factors, the literature shows that level of democracy is a key determinant of human rights (Davenport and Armstrong, 2004), especially civil liberties, as subcomponents of the democracy index.…”

Military expenditure and income distribution in South Korea

“…Empirical support for the income-widening hypothesis comes from Ali (2011) who found that high-income inequality leads to lower spending on education. Similarly, Abell (1994), Kentor, Jorgenson, and Kick (2012), Töngür and Elveren (2013) and Vadlamannati (2010) found that higher military spending causes higher income inequality. Additionally, Elveren (2012) for Turkey; Hirnissa, Habibullah, and Baharom (2009) for Malaysia; Meng, Lucyshyn, and Li (2013) for China; and Wolde-Rufael (2014) for Taiwan also found a one-way Granger causality running from military spending to income inequality.…”