Exploring the Relationships Among Middle School Students’ Peer Interactions, Task Efficiency, and Learning Engagement in Game-Based Learning

Abstract

Background. Middle school students’ math anxiety and low engagement have been major issues in math education. In order to reduce their anxiety and support their math learning, game-based learning (GBL) has been implemented. GBL research has underscored the role of social dynamics to facilitate a qualitative understanding of students’ knowledge. Whereas students’ peer interactions have been deemed a social dynamic, the relationships among peer interaction, task efficiency, and learning engagement were not well understood in previous empirical studies. Method. This mixed-method research implemented E-Rebuild, which is a 3D architecture game designed to promote students’ math problem-solving skills. We collected a total of 102 50-minutes gameplay sessions performed by 32 middle school students. Using video-captured and screen-recorded gameplaying sessions, we implemented behavior observations to measure students’ peer interaction efficiency, task efficiency, and learning engagement. We used association analyses, sequential analysis, and thematic analysis to explain how peer interaction promoted students’ task efficiency and learning engagement. Results. Students’ peer interactions were negatively related to task efficiency and learning engagement. There were also different gameplay patterns by students’ learning/task-relevant peer-interaction efficiency (PIE) level. Students in the low PIE group tended to progress through game tasks more efficiently than those in the high PIE group. The results of qualitative thematic analysis suggested that the students in the low PIE group showed more reflections on game-based mathematical problem solving, whereas those with high PIE experienced distractions during gameplay. Discussion. This study confirmed that students’ peer interactions without purposeful and knowledge-constructive collaborations led to their low task efficiency, as well as low learning engagement. The study finding shows further design implications: (1) providing in-game prompts to stimulate students’ math-related discussions and (2) developing collaboration contexts that legitimize students’ interpersonal knowledge exchanges with peers.

Facilitating nursing students' skill training in distance education via online game-based learning with the watch-summarize-question approach during the COVID-19 pandemic: A quasi-experimental study

“…The experimental results show that the integration of the entertainment value of Gather online game-based learning and educational materials with the watch-summarize-question strategy led to better participation, learning engagement, and learning satisfaction in the distance education context. As Moon and Ke (2020) suggested, students' active participation can benefit from online game-based learning. Using the online game-based learning approach in distance education can help nursing students gain the knowledge and skills of sputum suction, engage in more competitive activities, and be satisfied with their learning outcomes ( Liu and Hou, 2021 ).…”

How to generate customer and firm benefits through online game product and brand community engagement – online and offline perspectives

“…When consumers engage in online communities, they obtain useful information that can support future decisions (Bai et al, 2020). Peer interactions enable learners to confirm their knowledge application in different situations (Moon and Ke, 2020). This research also posits that the peer interaction of gamers through the brand community enables gamers to apply their skills in different situations, including in offline environments.…”

Enhancing Flipped Classroom with BeeMSee Board Game

“…Other studies have shown that GBL with high levels of engagement leads to positive student attitudes, behaviour, and retention in an enjoyable learning environment (Janakiraman et al, 2021;Xu et al, 2021). Notably, GBL allows students to participate in problem-solving actively, explore alternatives, and make mistakes in a more secure environment (Lee-Cultura et al, 2022;Moon & Ke, 2020;Carpenter et al, 2020). The objective of this study to:…”