PsycEXTRA Dataset 2009
DOI: 10.1037/e642702011-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Relationships between LA's BEST Program Attendance and Cognitive Gains of LA's BEST Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicated that higher levels of participation in the LA's BEST afterschool program led to better school attendance and higher scores on subsequent testing (Huang et al, 2000). Other studies on LA's BEST have resulted in similar findings Huang, De Vries, et al, 2004;Huang, Leon, La Torre, & Mostafavi, 2008).…”
Section: Evidence On the Benefits Of Afterschool Programssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The results indicated that higher levels of participation in the LA's BEST afterschool program led to better school attendance and higher scores on subsequent testing (Huang et al, 2000). Other studies on LA's BEST have resulted in similar findings Huang, De Vries, et al, 2004;Huang, Leon, La Torre, & Mostafavi, 2008).…”
Section: Evidence On the Benefits Of Afterschool Programssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The common practice of simply using a treatment indicator (i.e., splitting students into a treatment and non-treatment group) is usually insufficient to adequately capture the important program dynamics of student engagement (student average attendance). Noting the importance of regularly attending the program in order to be benefited by the experience (Huang, Leon/La Torre/Mostafavi, 2008), student engagement was added to clarify treatment effects in this study. It is theorized that exposure and intensity are likely related to unobserved student program participation decisions (e.g., parents work afterschool and the child has no other place to go) as opposed to student engagement, which is assumed to be related to students' interest in the program and program quality.…”
Section: Demographic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlling for student background factors, the researchers analyzed achievement using the following after-school attendance doses: less than 20 days, 21 to 50 days, 51 to 100 days, and more than 100 days. The research team found a significant effect on mathematics achievement for students who attended the program for more than 100 days (Huang et al 2008).…”
Section: Evaluations Using Program Dosagementioning
confidence: 99%