2014
DOI: 10.4148/2160-942x.1047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Revision of the ACRL Information Literacy Standards

Abstract: The Association for College and Research Libraries (ACRL) information literacy standards are currently under revision. As a result, several new concepts have been introduced that will no doubt impact information literacy across the United States. What do librarians understand about the new ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education (2014) that is being developed for application in academia? How will the new Framework (2014), the revision to ACRL Standards (2000), impact the way librarians str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the creation of stand-alone ethics classes taught by librarians is also building momentum, as calls for information literacy to become an academic discipline "[…] offered with the same rigor […]" as any other gain urgency, according to Creed-Dikeogu (2014, p. 3). Eight colleges, she notes, now offer an information literacy minor (Creed-Dikeogu, 2014). As these trends continue, more of journalism's instruction methods could be used in information literacy classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the creation of stand-alone ethics classes taught by librarians is also building momentum, as calls for information literacy to become an academic discipline "[…] offered with the same rigor […]" as any other gain urgency, according to Creed-Dikeogu (2014, p. 3). Eight colleges, she notes, now offer an information literacy minor (Creed-Dikeogu, 2014). As these trends continue, more of journalism's instruction methods could be used in information literacy classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%