2010
DOI: 10.1080/13572330903541979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Role of ‘Legislators’ in Canada: Do Members of Parliament Influence Policy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The “normative principle” of constituency influence is built into SMP electoral systems, after all. And while it is true that in parliamentary systems legislation necessarily comes out of cabinet, there exist parliamentary venues in which individual MPs can have an effect on legislative deliberations, and possibly an effect on legislative outcomes (or other policy outcomes; see Blidook, N.d.). In a country with an SMP electoral system (such as Canada), and a parliamentary venue in which representatives have at least some freedom in their legislative behaviour (such as Question Period), limited dyadic representation seems possible, and even likely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The “normative principle” of constituency influence is built into SMP electoral systems, after all. And while it is true that in parliamentary systems legislation necessarily comes out of cabinet, there exist parliamentary venues in which individual MPs can have an effect on legislative deliberations, and possibly an effect on legislative outcomes (or other policy outcomes; see Blidook, N.d.). In a country with an SMP electoral system (such as Canada), and a parliamentary venue in which representatives have at least some freedom in their legislative behaviour (such as Question Period), limited dyadic representation seems possible, and even likely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to 2004, a parliamentary committee exercised significant control over which members’ proposals would be deemed “votable” and thus eligible for debate, consideration, and passage (Blidook ). However, a new system was adopted in the 37 th Parliament (2000–2004) in which all eligible members were placed in a lottery that dictated the order in which MPs appeared on the “Order of Precedence,” a document that determines when legislators have the opportunity to bring their legislation to the floor for debate and a vote by the full Parliament.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endogenous rule changes can, and have in the past, been undertaken to remedy “professional” problems (Cox 2000; Squire 1992). For example, in the Canadian case, the legislature adjusted rules for Private Members' Business which has increased the potential policy influence of individual MPs (Blidook 2010), while former Prime Minister Paul Martin adjusted confidence rules to permit more free votes (Aucoin and Turnbull 2003).…”
Section: Theory and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%