2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the role of the realized return distribution in the formation of the implied volatility smile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies, however, found the violation of the EMH (see e.g. Ali et al , 2010; Chalamandaris and Rompolis, 2012; Nikmanesh et al , 2014; Westerlund and Narayan, 2014; Golosnoy et al , 2015), while some studies are in support of the EMH (Westerlund and Narayan, 2014). Responding to the literature, this study hence adopts the EMH in explaining the effect of GST announcement on stock market volatility.…”
Section: Related Literature and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies, however, found the violation of the EMH (see e.g. Ali et al , 2010; Chalamandaris and Rompolis, 2012; Nikmanesh et al , 2014; Westerlund and Narayan, 2014; Golosnoy et al , 2015), while some studies are in support of the EMH (Westerlund and Narayan, 2014). Responding to the literature, this study hence adopts the EMH in explaining the effect of GST announcement on stock market volatility.…”
Section: Related Literature and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, this model can generate time-varying equity and variance risk premia as it allows the conditional risk-neutral cumulants k Q j and, consequently, their physical counterparts to vary over time. 4 Chalamandaris and Rompolis (2012) reported that the average values of k Q 3 and k Q 4 are equal to −0.0004 and 0.00009, respectively, while the average value of k Q 2 is equal to 0.0036. These values correspond to time-series estimates of higher-order risk-neutral cumulants of the S&P 500 index from 1996 to 2007 estimated using option prices with 1-month time-to-maturity.…”
Section: S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chalamandaris and Rompolis () reported that the average values of k3Q and k4Q are equal to 0.0004 and 0.00009, respectively, while the average value of k2Q is equal to 0.0036. These values correspond to time‐series estimates of higher‐order risk‐neutral cumulants of the S&P 500 index from 1996 to 2007 estimated using option prices with 1‐month time‐to‐maturity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implied volatility from stock options can explain the realized volatility better than can the historical volatility (Szakmary et al 2003). Brous et al (2010), see also Chalamandris and Rompolis (2012), Carr and Wu (2016).…”
Section: Estimation Of Ex-ante Physical Densities From Option Pricesmentioning
confidence: 99%