2021
DOI: 10.3390/electronics10030347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Role of Trust and Expectations in CRI Using In-the-Wild Studies

Abstract: Studying interactions of children with humanoid robots in familiar spaces in natural contexts has become a key issue for social robotics. To fill this need, we conducted several Child–Robot Interaction (CRI) events with the Pepper robot in Polish and Japanese kindergartens. In this paper, we explore the role of trust and expectations towards the robot in determining the success of CRI. We present several observations from the video recordings of our CRI events and the transcripts of free-format question-answer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(124 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much research has been done on designing AI social robots to support children with cognitive and physical disabilities [ 25 – 30 ], sensory disabilities [ 31 ], learning disabilities [ 32 ], child development [ 33 ], and autism spectrum disorder [ 34 37 ]. Additionally, much research has been conducted more broadly on child-robot interactions [ 38 – 40 ], infant-robot interactions [ 41 , 42 ], robots for social isolation [ 6 ], and child-computer interactions (in HCI) [ 43 , 44 ]. Studies have also explored children interacting with robots for playful learning related to the associations between sounds and colors [ 45 ] and as cooperative co-players in interactive playgrounds [ 46 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research has been done on designing AI social robots to support children with cognitive and physical disabilities [ 25 – 30 ], sensory disabilities [ 31 ], learning disabilities [ 32 ], child development [ 33 ], and autism spectrum disorder [ 34 37 ]. Additionally, much research has been conducted more broadly on child-robot interactions [ 38 – 40 ], infant-robot interactions [ 41 , 42 ], robots for social isolation [ 6 ], and child-computer interactions (in HCI) [ 43 , 44 ]. Studies have also explored children interacting with robots for playful learning related to the associations between sounds and colors [ 45 ] and as cooperative co-players in interactive playgrounds [ 46 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zguda et al [3] explored the role of trust and expectations towards Pepper robots in determining the success of the interactions in Polish and Japanese kindergartens and present several observations from the video recordings of their Child-Robot Interaction (CRI) events and the transcripts of free-format question-answering sessions with the robot using the Wizard-of-Oz (WOZ) methodology. From these observations, they identified children's behaviors that indicate trust (or lack thereof) towards the robot, e.g., challenging behavior of a robot or physical interactions with it.…”
Section: Review Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%