2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1711.06362
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Use of Shatter for AllSAT Through Ramsey-Type Problems

Abstract: In the context of SAT solvers, Shatter is a popular tool for symmetry breaking on CNF formulas. Nevertheless, little has been said about its use in the context of AllSAT problems: problems where we are interested in listing all the models of a Boolean formula. AllSAT has gained much popularity in recent years due to its many applications in domains like model checking, data mining, etc. One example of a particularly transparent application of AllSAT to other fields of computer science is computational Ramsey t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This relaxation has an undesirable effect in the number of satisfying assignments of the resulting formula. In (Narváez 2017) we present a detailed analysis of this effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This relaxation has an undesirable effect in the number of satisfying assignments of the resulting formula. In (Narváez 2017) we present a detailed analysis of this effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sufficient condition for the set of colorings generated from the formula output by Shatter to be incomplete is the presence of free variables. For details, see (Narváez 2017), where we also provide an example of a graph G ex for which the coloring set generated from the output of preprocessing φ(G ex , C 5 , C 5 ) with Shatter does not generate a complete set of colorings even though φ(G ex , C 5 , C 5 ) has no free variables. This shows that the condition we present is not a necessary one.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation