Exploring the Use of Stakeholder Analysis Methodology in the Establishment of a Living Lab

Imset, Marius; Haavardtun, Per; Tannum, Marius Stian

doi:10.22215/timreview/1203

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The living Labs approach emerged to improve public management behaviour and increase rationality in the decision-making process (Fuglsang and Hansen, 2022). The approach is concerned with creating value and generating benefits for the broader group of stakeholders, particularly end users (Imset, Haavardtun and Tannum, 2018). This value creation is achieved through a collaborative, participatory, and iterative process involving co-design, implementing, and evaluating solutions (Hronszky and Kovács, 2013).…”

Section: Wef-living Labsmentioning

confidence: 99%

تحليل وبناء السيناريوهات المختلفة لإنشاء مختبرات الابتكار المفتوحة لمعالجة مشكلات رابطة المياة والطاقة والغذاء في لبنان والأردن

عبد العاطي,

عيسوي,

رضوان

2023

المجلة العربية لسياسات العلوم والتکنولوجيا والابتکار

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Establishing a sustainable WEF-NEXUS Open Living Lab (NDoLL) requires creative navigation of future opportunities and risks that might positively or negatively affect its operation. This article shows how to conduct effective scenario planning to explore future factors that might underpin or undermine the effective operation of the NDoLL in supporting ecosystem stakeholders in the Mediterranean area, covering two case examples: Jordan and Lebanon. The results show that, in Jordan, the most critical focal issues that will affect NDoLL's operations are Entrepreneurs' Interest and Engagement and Access to the network within the ecosystem. The economic situation and business regulatory framework will cast high uncertainties on those two issues. On the other hand, in Lebanon, engagement and participation of WEF ecosystem stakeholders and financing of NDoLL represent the key focal issues. Those two factors are likely susceptible to uncertainties imposed by political instability and economic stagnation.

show abstract

Section: Wef-living Labsmentioning

confidence: 99%

تحليل وبناء السيناريوهات المختلفة لإنشاء مختبرات الابتكار المفتوحة لمعالجة مشكلات رابطة المياة والطاقة والغذاء في لبنان والأردن

عبد العاطي,

عيسوي,

رضوان

2023

المجلة العربية لسياسات العلوم والتکنولوجيا والابتکار

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Four main stakeholder groups for living labs were identified by Ståhlbröst (2008) as companies, public organizations, researchers and end-users for any setting. The process of stakeholder engagement should follow a four-staged process of stakeholder identification, classification, investigation of relationships and reflection on the outcomes, as pinpointed by Imset et al (2018). The level of engagement with stakeholders, however, can vary (Graczyk, 2015).…”

Section: University "Living Labs"mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, findings need to be disseminated to the wider community and marketplace to facilitate practical implementation in the wider world. A broadscale stakeholder analysis and engagement is a crucial activity in the early stages of establishing living labs (Imset et al , 2018). Four main stakeholder groups for living labs were identified by Ståhlbröst (2008) as companies, public organizations, researchers and end-users for any setting.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Are university “living labs” able to deliver sustainable outcomes? A case-based appraisal of Deakin University, Australia

Martek

Hosseini

Durdyev

et al. 2022

IJSHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Universities have recognized their rich endowments in research, academic skills and facilities, as uniquely suited to finding “green” solutions. Moreover, the campus setting itself presents as a microcosm of greater society through which to investigate and test innovations. Thus, the “living lab” was born, a means of coupling sufficient resources and active stakeholders in the pursuit of practical, sustainable solutions. Much of the work to date, however, remains piecemeal, small-scale and disparate. This study aims to propose that the work of such labs must ultimately be directed, coordinated and integrated under a “university sustainability office,” if they are to be ultimately effective. Design/methodology/approach The research approach is twofold. In the first instance, a literature review charting the history and progress of living labs is reported, with emphasis of the university context. Second, a case study appraisal of Deakin University’s initiatives in adopting and promoting sustainability through the living lab framework is undertaken. Findings A main finding of this paper is that current efforts remain piecemeal and peripheral. If the apparent ambiguity regarding commitment is to be overcome, Deakin University should adopt measures as adopted by peer leaders in the field. Specifically, the setting up of a centralizing sustainability function bestowed with the capacity to coordinate university-wide living lab efforts, and at such a scale that substantial benefits transferable to greater society is generated. Originality/value This paper stands out among previous studies in the field through facilitating a transition to living lab for other universities, where findings facilitate that progress and consider how the lessons learnt might inform the further evolution of university living lab initiatives.

show abstract

“…The introduction of MASS into the operation is mainly related to the assessment of the economic benefits of them, simultaneously ensuring the proper level of safety [11][12][13]. One of the key issues for shipowners is the cost-effectiveness of the implemented solution and the scale of its benefits.…”

Section: Fully Autonomous Shipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Costs and Benefits of Autonomous Shipping—A Literature Review

Ziajka-Poznańska

Montewka²

2021

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of autonomous ship technology is currently in focus worldwide and the literature on this topic is growing. However, an in-depth cost and benefit estimation of such endeavours is in its infancy. With this systematic literature review, we present the state-of-the-art system regarding costs and benefits of the operation of prospective autonomous merchant ships with an objective for identifying contemporary research activities concerning an estimation of operating, voyage, and capital costs in prospective, autonomous shipping and vessel platooning. Additionally, the paper outlines research gaps and the need for more detailed business models for operating autonomous ships. Results reveal that valid financial models of autonomous shipping are lacking and there is significant uncertainty affecting the cost estimates, rendering only a reliable evaluation of specific case studies. The findings of this paper may be found relevant not only by academia, but also organisations considering to undertake a challenge of implementing Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships in their operations.

show abstract

Exploring the Use of Stakeholder Analysis Methodology in the Establishment of a Living Lab

Cited by 4 publications

References 6 publications

تحليل وبناء السيناريوهات المختلفة لإنشاء مختبرات الابتكار المفتوحة لمعالجة مشكلات رابطة المياة والطاقة والغذاء في لبنان والأردن

تحليل وبناء السيناريوهات المختلفة لإنشاء مختبرات الابتكار المفتوحة لمعالجة مشكلات رابطة المياة والطاقة والغذاء في لبنان والأردن

Are university “living labs” able to deliver sustainable outcomes? A case-based appraisal of Deakin University, Australia

Costs and Benefits of Autonomous Shipping—A Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About