2006
DOI: 10.1177/00224669060400010201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Validity of the Oregon Extended Writing Assessment

Abstract: Research into the technical adequacy of statewide alternate assessments is limited. In this study, the authors analyzed 2 years of data from one state's alternate assessment in written language in an attempt to validate current test score interpretations. More than 1,000 students were included in each year. Findings support the test's technical adequacy on two major dimensions: (a) strong convergent and discriminant evidence for tasks on the assessment and (b) evidence that a collection of writing subtasks con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first two components are related to transcription (i.e., handwriting and spelling), and the second two are related to text generation (i.e., sentence and text production). This factorial structure seems similar to the one found in English-language studies (e.g., Crawford, Tindal, & Carpenter, 2006).…”
Section: About the Articles In The Special Seriessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The first two components are related to transcription (i.e., handwriting and spelling), and the second two are related to text generation (i.e., sentence and text production). This factorial structure seems similar to the one found in English-language studies (e.g., Crawford, Tindal, & Carpenter, 2006).…”
Section: About the Articles In The Special Seriessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The first two components are related to transcription (handwriting and spelling), and the second two components are related to text production (sentence and text production). This factorial structure appears to be similar to the one found in English language studies (e.g., Crawford, Tindal, & Carpenter, 2006); however, we wanted to find out what happens when young children produce letters, words, and sentences on the keyboard instead of producing them with a pen or pencil. Based on factorial analysis, we analyzed whether children with handwriting or spelling disabilities—or both—differ from typically achieving writers in their performance based on components identified by means of the TEVET.…”
Section: Development Of Keyboarding Skills and Learning Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Some similarities and differences between pen and keyboard modes were found when underlying patterns of handwriting and keyboarding skills were analyzed. Previous research identified four main components in pen mode: letter production, word production, sentence production, and text production (Crawford et al, 2006 [English]; Jiménez, 2016 [Spanish]). In Spanish, handwriting included fluency in allograph writing and fluency in alphabet copying, whereas spelling included correctly spelled words during dictation, both out of context and in context, in sentences, writing pseudowords, and writing the alphabet in the correct order from memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies (Crawford, Tindal, & Carpenter, 2006;Elliott, Compton, & Roach, 2007;Johnson & Arnold, 2004) have examined the evidence of the validity of different states' alternate assessments. These investigators have found that it is difficult to support the evidence of validity due to the variability of the population studied (Johnson & Arnold).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%