2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmp.2019.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring tourists' perceptions of tourism impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
4
56
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The social impact of tourism is nowadays acknowledged by a number of studies with negative overtourism situations shown as the extreme case (UNWTO 2019). The cultural impact of tourism on local societies is also an interesting recent line of research with standardization and globalization issues outstanding in this debate, where the local culture becomes highly impacted for the extension of tourism activities (Joo, Chob, and Woosnamc 2019). These two issues appear to be well addressed by the PI model.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social impact of tourism is nowadays acknowledged by a number of studies with negative overtourism situations shown as the extreme case (UNWTO 2019). The cultural impact of tourism on local societies is also an interesting recent line of research with standardization and globalization issues outstanding in this debate, where the local culture becomes highly impacted for the extension of tourism activities (Joo, Chob, and Woosnamc 2019). These two issues appear to be well addressed by the PI model.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a gradual expansion to new contexts and inclusion of new variables is the path that other scales also followed. For instance, the Emotional Solidarity Scale (Woosnam & Norman, 2010) has been constantly tested in newer contexts (e.g., Joo et al, 2019; Woosnam et al, 2015) to enhance its psychometric properties and empirical utility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-factor structure of the modified ESS departs from what others have found. Studies have constantly identified the same three factors of emotional closeness, feeling welcomed (or welcoming nature ), and sympathetic understanding whether the focus was on tourists (e.g., Joo et al 2018; Joo, Cho, and Woosnam 2019; Ribeiro et al 2018; Woosnam and Aleshinloye 2013) or residents (e.g., Lai and Hitchcock 2017; Li and Wan 2017; Woosnam 2012). This deviation from the three-factor structure can be attributed to at least two causes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, extensive efforts have been made to test the validity and the reliability of the ESS (e.g., Ribeiro et al 2018; Woosnam 2011a, 2011b, 2012; Woosnam and Aleshinloye 2013), and the scale has been found appropriate in measuring emotional solidarity of both residents (Woosnam 2011b, 2012) and tourists (Woosnam and Aleshinloye 2013; Woosnam, Dudensing, and Walker 2015; Woosnam et al 2015) within the United States. More recently, studies outside of the United States, in nations like Cape Verde (Ribeiro et al 2018), Japan (Woosnam, Maruyama, and Boley 2016), Macau (Lai and Hitchcock 2017; Li and Wan 2017), Malaysia (Hasani, Moghavvemi, and Hamzah 2016), Nigeria (Woosnam, Aleshinloye, and Maruyama 2016; Woosnam et al 2016), and South Korea (Joo, Cho, and Woosnam 2019), have demonstrated the cross-cultural applicability of the scale as well.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%