2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00928-1_74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Deep Networks for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection and Segmentation

Abstract: Deep learning (DL) networks have recently been shown to outperform other segmentation methods on various public, medical-image challenge datasets [3,11,16], especially for large pathologies. However, in the context of diseases such as Multiple Sclerosis (MS), monitoring all the focal lesions visible on MRI sequences, even very small ones, is essential for disease staging, prognosis, and evaluating treatment efficacy. Moreover, producing deterministic outputs hinders DL adoption into clinical routines. Uncertai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peak activations of the identified brain regions which are most discriminative of progression of MCI to AD were localized by estimating occlusion sensitivity using the network occlusion approach (Zeiler and Fergus 2014). We pursued this probability-based approach to estimate and quantify the relevance of the different brain regions in the classification decisions, although few other popular approaches (Nair, Precup, Arnold, & Arbel, 2018;Zintgraf, Cohen, Adel, & Welling, 2017) could be adapted too. In this approach, brain networks in correspondence with the automated anatomical labelling (AAL) brain atlas were occluded one at a time, class probabilities re-evaluated, and the relevance of each brain region was estimated proportional to the decrease in target class probabilities when that specific region was occluded.…”
Section: Localizing Abnormalities: Discriminative Brain Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak activations of the identified brain regions which are most discriminative of progression of MCI to AD were localized by estimating occlusion sensitivity using the network occlusion approach (Zeiler and Fergus 2014). We pursued this probability-based approach to estimate and quantify the relevance of the different brain regions in the classification decisions, although few other popular approaches (Nair, Precup, Arnold, & Arbel, 2018;Zintgraf, Cohen, Adel, & Welling, 2017) could be adapted too. In this approach, brain networks in correspondence with the automated anatomical labelling (AAL) brain atlas were occluded one at a time, class probabilities re-evaluated, and the relevance of each brain region was estimated proportional to the decrease in target class probabilities when that specific region was occluded.…”
Section: Localizing Abnormalities: Discriminative Brain Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is highly desirable to make deep learning models probabilistic in a way that allows for uncertainty quantification, indicating how confident the NN is about predictions for a given input. Steps towards such uncertainty quantification in deep learning have been taken in the context of computer vision [19][20][21][22] as well as in medical imaging applications (e.g., in MS lesion detection, 23 melanoma detection 24 and generation of synthetic CT from MRI 25 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty metrics were recently investigated by Eaton-Rosen et al [6] in a binary segmentation problem of the brain tumor, specifically for quantifying the uncertainty in volume measurement. Nair et al [22] also explored uncertainty in binary segmentation for lesion detection in multiple sclerosis. Our present work is distinct from these previous works in that we demonstrated correlation between the structure-wise uncertainty metric, namely MC sample variance, and the Dice coefficient of each structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It measures the degree of difference of each test sample from the training data set, originated from the deficiency of training data, namely epistemic uncertainty [15]. This method has been applied to brain lesion segmentation [6], [22] and surgical tool segmentation [10]. Two example applications of the uncertainty metric explored in this study are; 1) prediction of segmentation accuracy without using the ground truth similar to the goal of Valindria et al [35] and, 2) the active-learning framework [19], [39] for the reduction of manual annotation costs.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%