2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2015.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Web 2.0 political engagement: Is new technology reducing the biases of political participation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When considering the potential impact of digital engagement learning opportunities on varied forms of online politics, we highlight two forms of online activity: Online Participatory Politics and Targeted Political Pressure. These forms of online political activity might be placed within a range of broader categories such as 'Connective Action' (Bennett and Segerberg 2012), 'e-expressive' participation (Gibson and Cantijoch 2013), 'cyber participation' (Steinberg 2015), and 'political social networking' (Bode et al 2014). By Online Participatory Politics (OPP), we refer to activities that are interactive and peer-based and through which individuals and groups aim to express voice and influence on issues of public concern.…”
Section: The Increasing Significance Of Digital Engagement Learning Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering the potential impact of digital engagement learning opportunities on varied forms of online politics, we highlight two forms of online activity: Online Participatory Politics and Targeted Political Pressure. These forms of online political activity might be placed within a range of broader categories such as 'Connective Action' (Bennett and Segerberg 2012), 'e-expressive' participation (Gibson and Cantijoch 2013), 'cyber participation' (Steinberg 2015), and 'political social networking' (Bode et al 2014). By Online Participatory Politics (OPP), we refer to activities that are interactive and peer-based and through which individuals and groups aim to express voice and influence on issues of public concern.…”
Section: The Increasing Significance Of Digital Engagement Learning Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideological tendency, which represents the support of a party, is more interested in the news of the supportive tendency, and it decreases the political involvement as it is exposed to the opinion opposite to the support tendency of the individual [13,24,25,28]. On the other hand, there are also some studies that the intensity of political support is not statistically significant with increasing turnout or online political participation [31]. Income, education, and gender are also identified as factors affecting offline and online political participation [8,18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Income, education, and gender are also identified as factors affecting offline and online political participation [8,18]. On the other hand, traditional socioeconomic factors such as income, education level, and gender appear to have no effect on traditional participation and online participation [13,30,31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having been developed for offline forms of political participation, it is debated to what extent these factors can be used to explain online participation. Up to now, numerous empirical analyses have been run addressing the question of who is politically active online and why (see, e.g., Anduiza, Jensen, & Jorba, ; Borge & Cardinal, ; Chadwick & Howard, ; Dalton, ; Emmer, Wolling, & Vowe, ; Schlozman, Brady, & Verba, ; Steinberg, ). In general, empirical studies have questioned and partly refuted initial expectations that online media could reach out to new, formerly inactive groups: Indeed, Internet‐based communication and participation options foremost attract those who are otherwise politically active.…”
Section: Political Participation In Theory and Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%