2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explosive reconnection of double tearing modes in relativistic plasmas: application to the Crab flares

Abstract: Magnetic reconnection associated to the double tearing mode (DTM) is investigated by means of resistive relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (RRMHD) simulations. A linearly unstable double current sheet system in two dimensional cartesian geometry is considered. For initial perturbations of large enough longitudinal wavelengths, a fast reconnection event is triggered by a secondary instability that is structurally driven by the nonlinear evolution of the magnetic islands. The latter reconnection phase and time sca… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stationary reconnecting current sheet is unstable to a fast tearing instability, or plasmoid instability above a critical value of the Lundquist number that is typically quoted as S S c = 10 4 (Loureiro et al 2007), leading to a reconnection rate of order 10 −2 v A (Samtaney et al 2009;Bhattacharjee et al 2009;Uzdensky et al 2010;Loureiro et al 2012;Huang & Bhattacharjee 2013;Murphy et al 2013;Comisso et al 2016;Comisso et al 2017;Tolman et al 2018). Special relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamic (SRRMHD) simulations have confirmed this critical value of the Lundquist number in relativistic plasmas with a uniform resistivity Zenitani et al 2010;Zanotti & Dumbser 2011;Takamoto 2013;Baty & Pétri 2013;Pétri et al 2014;Del Zanna et al 2016;Papini et al 2018). Plasmoids formed by the tearing instability can undergo mergers, bulk acceleration, and growth within the reconnection layer (Guo et al 2014;Sironi & Spitkovsky 2014;Sironi et al 2016;Werner et al 2018;Petropoulou et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A stationary reconnecting current sheet is unstable to a fast tearing instability, or plasmoid instability above a critical value of the Lundquist number that is typically quoted as S S c = 10 4 (Loureiro et al 2007), leading to a reconnection rate of order 10 −2 v A (Samtaney et al 2009;Bhattacharjee et al 2009;Uzdensky et al 2010;Loureiro et al 2012;Huang & Bhattacharjee 2013;Murphy et al 2013;Comisso et al 2016;Comisso et al 2017;Tolman et al 2018). Special relativistic resistive magnetohydrodynamic (SRRMHD) simulations have confirmed this critical value of the Lundquist number in relativistic plasmas with a uniform resistivity Zenitani et al 2010;Zanotti & Dumbser 2011;Takamoto 2013;Baty & Pétri 2013;Pétri et al 2014;Del Zanna et al 2016;Papini et al 2018). Plasmoids formed by the tearing instability can undergo mergers, bulk acceleration, and growth within the reconnection layer (Guo et al 2014;Sironi & Spitkovsky 2014;Sironi et al 2016;Werner et al 2018;Petropoulou et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our AMR approach allows us to effectively resolve the plasmoid phase of the evolution with 16384 2 cells. In previous numerical MHD studies of relativistic reconnection, the nonlinear phase at very late stages of the tearing instability for very high Lundquist numbers was never resolved with such high resolutions (Zenitani et al 2010;Zanotti & Dumbser 2011;Baty & Pétri 2013;Takamoto 2013;Pétri et al 2014;Del Zanna et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Magnetic reconnection is the great favorite, however, for the modeling of explosive phenomena, that exhibit very rapid time variability and impulsive character (e.g., Lyutikov 2006;Baty et al 2013;Cerutti et al 2014 andZweibel &Yamada 2009;Uzdensky 2011Uzdensky , 2016. Given the complexity of these models and the wide range of parameters that have to be accounted for, we stick to our maximization strategy and consider in the following the maximally efficient acceleration timescale, with η ∼ 1.…”
Section: Acceleration Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, relativistic reconnection could be important in pair plasmas (see Kagan et al 2015, and references therein), and in particular it should be an ingredient in the modeling of Pulsar Wind Nebulae in order to explain dissipation of magnetic energy in the so-called striped wind region (Coroniti 1990;Kirk & Skjaeraasen 2003;Pétri & Lyubarsky 2007;Amano & Kirk 2013;Takamoto, Pétri & Baty 2015), and the sudden gamma-ray flares observed in the Crab nebula, probably originated in the vicinities of the wind termination shock (Tavani 2013;Baty, Petri & Zenitani 2013;Cerutti et al 2014;Lyutikov et al 2016). Promising results are starting to come from two-fluid relativistic MHD simulations (Barkov et al 2014;Barkov & Komissarov 2016), as a viable alternative to fully kinetic particle-in-cell (PIC) methods, which are more computationally demanding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%