2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.84.061152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential complexity of the quantum adiabatic algorithm for certain satisfiability problems

Abstract: We determine the complexity of several constraint satisfaction problems using the quantum adiabatic algorithm in its simplest implementation. We do so by studying the size dependence of the gap to the first excited state of "typical" instances. We find that at large sizes N , the complexity increases exponentially for all models that we study. We also compare our results against the complexity of the analogous classical algorithm WalkSAT and show that the harder the problem is for the classical algorithm the h… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
95
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This requires an analysis of the size dependence of the minimum gap for large sizes, presumably using Quantum Monte Carlo simulations, e.g. [46], to get to large enough sizes to see the trend.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires an analysis of the size dependence of the minimum gap for large sizes, presumably using Quantum Monte Carlo simulations, e.g. [46], to get to large enough sizes to see the trend.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the system eventually reaches the ground state of the original Ising model representing the solution to the combinatorial optimization problem. There exists a large body of analytical, numerical, and experimental studies on quantum annealing, and active debates are going on to compare quantum annealing with the corresponding classical heuristic, simulated annealing, recent examples of which include Matsuda et al (2009), Young et al (2010), Hen and Young (2011), Farhi et al (2012), Boixo et al (2014), Katzgraber et al (2014Katzgraber et al ( , 2015, Rønnow et al (2014), Albash et al (2015), Heim et al (2015), Hen et al (2015), Isakov et al (2016), Martin-Mayor and Hen (2015), Steiger et al (2015), Venturelli et al (2015), Crosson and Harrow (2016), Denchev et al (2016), Kechedzhi and Smelyanskiy (2016), Mandrà et al (2016a,b), Marshall et al (2016), and Muthukrishnan et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent promising experimental research findings [11][12][13], as well as intensive theoretical work [see, e.g., [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] in the field of Adiabatic Quantum Computing (AQC) suggest the possibility that some of the experimental difficulties may be overcome by the use of "quantum annealing" devices, which implement the simple yet potentially-powerful quantum-adiabatic algorithmic approach proposed by Farhi et al [24] about a decade ago. AQC is an analog, continuous, quantum computing paradigm, and as such it has the potential of being easier to implement successfully, offering several advantages over the "traditional" gate model, in the form of inherent fault-tolerance and natural robustness against decoherence and dephasing [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%