2017
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.1634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential Consensus for Nonlinear Multi‐Agent Systems with Communication and Input Delays via Hybrid Control

Abstract: This paper aims to investigate the exponential leader-following consensus for nonlinear multi-agent systems with time-varying communication and input delays by using hybrid control. Based on the Lyapunov functional method, impulsive differential equation theory and matrix analysis, we show that all the followers can achieve leader-following consensus with the virtual leader exponentially even if only a fraction of followers can obtain the leader's information. Two classes of exponential consensus criteria as w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows that under lower control gains, the agents with fractional orders are more tolerant than those with integer orders, while under high control gains, the agents with integer orders are more tolerant th an those with fractional orders. Here, the order of the leader is assumed as = 0.8, the order of the follower is assumed as = 0.9, the control gain is chosen as = 1, the dynamic 2and (12), which can verify the correctness of Theorem 2. Besides, Figure 7 shows that if the input delay increases, the time to fulfill leader-following consensus of the HFOMASs (2) and (12) will increase.…”
Section: ) Case Without Input Delaysmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 6 shows that under lower control gains, the agents with fractional orders are more tolerant than those with integer orders, while under high control gains, the agents with integer orders are more tolerant th an those with fractional orders. Here, the order of the leader is assumed as = 0.8, the order of the follower is assumed as = 0.9, the control gain is chosen as = 1, the dynamic 2and (12), which can verify the correctness of Theorem 2. Besides, Figure 7 shows that if the input delay increases, the time to fulfill leader-following consensus of the HFOMASs (2) and (12) will increase.…”
Section: ) Case Without Input Delaysmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…, is the input delay with identical value for each follower, the definitions of other parameters and variables in (12) are the same as those of (3) and (5). (2) and (12) can be achieved if and only if…”
Section: Case With Identical Input Delaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…e authors discussed in [11,12]. Dynamic structures are often subjected to several disturbances in functional applications, such as communication delays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%