2021
DOI: 10.1137/20m1352922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential Convergence for Multiscale Linear Elliptic PDEs via Adaptive Edge Basis Functions

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a multiscale framework based on adaptive edge basis functions to solve second-order linear elliptic PDEs with rough coefficients. One of the main results is that we prove that the proposed multiscale method achieves nearly exponential convergence in the approximation error with respect to the computational degrees of freedom. Our strategy is to perform an energy orthogonal decomposition of the solution space into a coarse scale component comprising a-harmonic functions in each eleme… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where n is the total number of scales and h(n) and g(n) are the filter coefficients. Formulas ( 7) and ( 8) describe the relationship between adjacent two-scale spatial basis functions [21], and these two equations are called two-scale equations.…”
Section: D Point Cloud Reconstruction Of Inverted Arches Of Soft Rock...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n is the total number of scales and h(n) and g(n) are the filter coefficients. Formulas ( 7) and ( 8) describe the relationship between adjacent two-scale spatial basis functions [21], and these two equations are called two-scale equations.…”
Section: D Point Cloud Reconstruction Of Inverted Arches Of Soft Rock...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a vast literature on numerical upscaling of multiscale PDEs. For our context, i.e., elliptic PDEs with rough coefficients, rigorous theoretical results include generalized finite element methods [1,2], harmonic coordinates [28], LOD [23,15,18,10,14,22], Gamblets related approaches [29,30,25,26,17,27], and generalizations of multiscale finite element methods [16,8,20,12,6,7]. Among them, the ones most related to this paper are LOD and Gamblets; the connection has been explained in subsection 1.1.3.…”
Section: Numerical Upscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). The local 15 (global 16 ) results are more accurate than required by about 14 Since we assume that u 0 = g D = g N = 0 for Example 3 and 4 (thus u b = 0), we used Algorithm 2 with the improved relative global error bound 2 Proposition 5.4) to generate the results shown in Fig. 10.…”
Section: Global Gfem Approximation With Random Local Basis Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A technically similar approach is proposed in [28] for the solution of Laplacian eigenvalue problems. Furthermore, optimal interface spaces for (parametrized) elliptic problems are introduced in [57], generalized to geometry changes in [56], and also proposed in [14]. Concerning (real-world) applications the optimal local approximation spaces are employed, for instance, for the construction of digital twins [34,38] and in the context of data assimilation [59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%