2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00222-020-01024-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential decay of correlations in the two-dimensional random field Ising model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
22
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Classic results include the work of Aizenman and Wehr [AW90], who showed that in d " 2, as long as there is randomness in the external field, the boundary influence always decays to 0 as N Ñ 8. Recently, this decay was shown to be exponential by Ding and Xia [DX21] and also Aizenman, Harel and Peled [AHP20] for Gaussian random fields. In contrast, in d ě 3, Bricmont and Kupiainen [BK88] showed that when the distribution of the random field ω v has a sufficiently fast decaying Gaussian tail, then at sufficiently low temperatures, the boundary influence does not vanish as N Ñ 8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Classic results include the work of Aizenman and Wehr [AW90], who showed that in d " 2, as long as there is randomness in the external field, the boundary influence always decays to 0 as N Ñ 8. Recently, this decay was shown to be exponential by Ding and Xia [DX21] and also Aizenman, Harel and Peled [AHP20] for Gaussian random fields. In contrast, in d ě 3, Bricmont and Kupiainen [BK88] showed that when the distribution of the random field ω v has a sufficiently fast decaying Gaussian tail, then at sufficiently low temperatures, the boundary influence does not vanish as N Ñ 8.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…There has been controversy over this prediction for quite some time, and it was finally proved to be correct by [20,8] for d = 3 and by [4] for d = 2. In recent works [11,3,15,2] quantitative bounds on the decay rate in dimension two were obtained, and in particular, exponential decay was finally established in [15,2]. In addition, the authors of [14] studied (a notion of) the correlation length, defined as…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A∈A (q − 1) h∈E σ:Aσ=A ν 1 (h, σ)dh q−1 j=1 h∈E σ:Aσ =A ν 1 (h A,j , σ A,j )dh + P(E c ) (since h σ ν 1 (h A,j , σ A,j )dh = 1) A∈A (q − 1)e − |∂A| 2(q−1)T + P(E c ) (by (26) and by definition of E) e −c/T + e −c/ε 2 (by (15) and Lemma 4.2) , as required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surprising phenomena is that this picture changes for the random field Ising model: on Z d for d ≥ 3 there is still a phase transition if the variance of the random fields h x is not too large [7], but on Z 2 there is no phase transition if the variance is non-zero [1]. In fact, in recent breakthroughs, it was shown that on Z 2 correlations always decay exponentially [13], and on Z d , d ≥ 3, correlations decay exponentially throughout the high-temperature regime [12]. It is natural to wonder if there are algorithmic counterparts to these physical phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%