2005
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.a.20043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential parameter estimation (in NMR) using Bayesian probability theory

Abstract: Data modeled as sums of exponentials arise in many areas of science and are common in NMR. However, exponential parameter estimation is fundamentally a difficult problem. In this article, Bayesian probability theory is used to obtain optimal exponential parameter estimates. The calculations are implemented using Markov chain Monte Carlo with simulated annealing to draw samples from the joint posterior probability for all of the parameters appearing in the exponential model. Monte Carlo integration is then used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To perform this calculation, the model must be part of the inference problem. Equations [1][2][3][4] are the four different functional forms considered, but those equations do not by themselves designate a model. For example, Eq.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To perform this calculation, the model must be part of the inference problem. Equations [1][2][3][4] are the four different functional forms considered, but those equations do not by themselves designate a model. For example, Eq.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] is the prior probability for the parameters given the model indicator times the direct probability for the data, given the parameters and the model indicator. This integrand is the posterior probability for the parameters given the model indicator, and the calculation of this probability was addressed in (1). The details of factoring and assigning these probabilities are not repeated here, and we use the results from (1).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations