2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exponential stabilization of distributed semilinear systems by optimal control

Abstract: This paper studies exponential stabilization of distributed semilinear systems. The paper (i) gives a constrained feedback control that ensure the exponential stabilizability and (ii) shows that this control is the unique solution of an appropriate minimization problem. Examples of hyperbolic partial equations are provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…k yðtÞk M ffi ffi t p , M 4 0, for t large enough), has been obtained (Berrahmoune 1999;Ouzahra 2008). The case r ¼ 2 has been considered bilinear/semilinear systems in Ouzahra (2010) and Ouzahra (2011), where exponential stabilisation results have been established using p 2 (t) provided that the observation assumption (3) holds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…k yðtÞk M ffi ffi t p , M 4 0, for t large enough), has been obtained (Berrahmoune 1999;Ouzahra 2008). The case r ¼ 2 has been considered bilinear/semilinear systems in Ouzahra (2010) and Ouzahra (2011), where exponential stabilisation results have been established using p 2 (t) provided that the observation assumption (3) holds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where n : H → H is a (possibly) nonlinear operator. Let us also consider the perturbed system on A and B : Then, 1) the control (17) uniformly exponentially stabilizes the system (35) for any perturbation n ∈ P N such that L n < σ M , where M, σ are given by ( 18), 2) the control (17) uniformly exponentially stabilizes (36) under any perturbation (a, b) ∈ P 2 N such that :…”
Section: Proof 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this way the convergence of the resulting closed loop state is not better than z(t) = O( 1 √ t ). The problem of exponential stabilization of the system (1) has been considered in [11,34,36] with the following bounded feedback v(t) = −ρ z(t), Bz(t) z(t) 2 1 {t≥0; z(t) =0} , (5) where ρ > 0 is the gain control. Moreover, under the assumption (4), the exponential stabilization of (1) has been studied in [37] using the switching control w(t) = −ρ sign( z(t), Bz(t) ), ρ > 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, others polynomial estimates was provided in [27] using the control p r (t) with r < 2. The case r = 2 has been considered in [26], where exponential stabilization results have been established using p 2 (t) under the observation assumption (3). Note that the inequality (3) is necessary for uniform stabilization of conservative systems, so we can not expect such a degree of stability under a weaker observability assumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%