2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-011-9870-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exporting a Google Earth™ aided earth-flow susceptibility model: a test in central Sicily

Abstract: In the framework of a regional landslide susceptibility study in southern Sicily, a test has been carried out in the Tumarrano river basin (about 80 km 2 ) aimed at characterizing its landslide susceptibility conditions by exporting a ''source model'', defined and trained inside a limited (about 20 km 2 ) representative sector (the ''source area''). Also, the possibility of exploiting Google Earth TM software and photo-images databank to produce the landslide archives has been checked. The susceptibility model… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Webley et al (2009) used GE to display the volcanic ash dispersion process in the North Pacific region forecasted using the Puff model. Costanzo et al (2012) produced a landslide archive by exploiting GE for assessing landslide susceptibility in central Sicily, Italy. Ruan and Jia (2013) and Madadi et al (2015) employed GE to depict and display possible extent of flooding.…”
Section: Geib and Taubenböckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Webley et al (2009) used GE to display the volcanic ash dispersion process in the North Pacific region forecasted using the Puff model. Costanzo et al (2012) produced a landslide archive by exploiting GE for assessing landslide susceptibility in central Sicily, Italy. Ruan and Jia (2013) and Madadi et al (2015) employed GE to depict and display possible extent of flooding.…”
Section: Geib and Taubenböckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The landslide inventory was prepared (Costanzo et al 2012a) by a remote Google Earth™-aided recognition survey, exploiting highresolution images of the area (catalog ID: 1010010008265000, date: Jun. 11, 2008, sensor: QB02, band info: Pan_MS1; catalog ID: 10100100071CDC00, date: Aug. 28, 2007, sensor: QB02, band info: Pan_MS1).…”
Section: Landslidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of previous studies Conditional analysis (CA) Clerici et al (2010, Conoscenti et al (2008, Costanzo et al (2012a, 2012b, Irigaray et al (2007), Jiménez-Peralvárez et al (2009), Rotigliano et al (2011, 2012, Vergari et al (2011) Discriminant analysis (DA) Baeza and Corominas (2001), Carrara (1983), Carrara et al (2008), Guzzetti et al (2006), Rossi et al (2010. ) Binary logistic regression (BLR) Atkinson and Massari (1998), Ayalew and Yamagishi (2005), Bai et al (2010), Can et al (2005), Carrara et al (2008), Chauan et al (2010), Conforti et al (2012), Dai and Lee (2002), Davis and Ohlmacher (2002), Erener and Düzgün (2010), Mathew et al (2009), Nandi and Shakoor (2009), Nefeslioglu et al (2008, Ohlmacher and Davis (2003), Van den Eckhaut et al (2006 Classification and regression trees (CART) Felicísimo et al (2012), Vorpahl et al (2012) Artificial neuronal networks (ANN) Aleotti and Chowdhury (1999), Ermini et al (2005), Lee et al (2004), Pradhan and Lee (2010) Original Paper exploited to compare the fitting of the model having only the constant term (all the β p are set to 0) with the fitting of the model that includes all the considered predictors with their estimated non-null coefficients so as to verify if the increase in likelihood is significant; in this case, at least one of the p coefficients is to be expected as different from zero …”
Section: Statistical Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A third scheme, frequently adopted for model spatial transferability or exportation (e.g. Von Ruette et al, 2011;Costanzo et al, 2012a;Lombardo et al, 2014;Petschko et al, 2014), is based on the adoption of two different catchments or areas for calibration and validation (spatial partition).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%