2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2016.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposing and selling the use of web services—an option to be considered in make-or-buy decision-making

Abstract: Abstract:The emergence of the web service market has enabled firms to choose between developing web services internally and purchasing them externally from web service providers. In general, these socalled make-or-buy decisions have been the object of intense debate in the IT outsourcing literature.However, characteristics of web services such as loose coupling and the current trend of digitalizing application interfaces enable new opportunities especially to non-software firms: when a firm decides to develop … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to viewing DIY as a possible response to a perceived lack of product quality, it was assumed that consumers dealt with these inadequacies through complaining behaviors (Tronvoll, 2012) such as negative word of mouth and boycotts (Brown and Beltramini, 1989). However, the academic literature on service quality failure and strategies to bypass such failure is limited (Flores and Primo, 2008), and research on the make-or-buy decision centers on businesses and not consumers, with topics such as vertical integration in manufacturing and the costs associated with service provider failure (Jayawardhena et al , 2007; Zimmermann et al , 2016). Because strategies for addressing a lack of quality from a small business owner/manager’s perspective have not received much attention, we use the Wolf and McQuitty (2013) notion of DIY behavior as a possible response to a perceived lack of quality.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to viewing DIY as a possible response to a perceived lack of product quality, it was assumed that consumers dealt with these inadequacies through complaining behaviors (Tronvoll, 2012) such as negative word of mouth and boycotts (Brown and Beltramini, 1989). However, the academic literature on service quality failure and strategies to bypass such failure is limited (Flores and Primo, 2008), and research on the make-or-buy decision centers on businesses and not consumers, with topics such as vertical integration in manufacturing and the costs associated with service provider failure (Jayawardhena et al , 2007; Zimmermann et al , 2016). Because strategies for addressing a lack of quality from a small business owner/manager’s perspective have not received much attention, we use the Wolf and McQuitty (2013) notion of DIY behavior as a possible response to a perceived lack of quality.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, Benaroch and Kauffman (2000) examine a case in order to validate the added value of deferral options for strategic IT investments and elaborate on ROA's advantages instead of traditional IT investment evaluation methods. ROA's application in IS research focuses mainly on IT investment decisions in general (Chen et al 2009) or on specific technologies (Lee and Lee 2011;Nwankpa et al 2016;Wu et al 2009;Zimmermann et al 2016).…”
Section: Real Options Analysis In Information Systems Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Articles dealing with the monitoring phase predominantly focus on the assessment of service quality from the perspective of the buying company (see, for example, Hawkins Fig. 7 Percentage of papers written, in which service purchasing process perspective Zimmermann et al 2016). Furthermore, it is noteworthy that nearly all publications take a business-to-business perspective, i.e.…”
Section: Content Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%