2009
DOI: 10.1109/tifs.2008.2012215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposing Digital Forgeries From JPEG Ghosts

Abstract: Abstract-When creating a digital forgery, it is often necessary to combine several images, for example, when compositing one person's head onto another person's body. If these images were originally of different JPEG compression quality, then the digital composite may contain a trace of the original compression qualities. To this end, we describe a technique to detect if part of an image was initially compressed at a lower quality than the rest of the image. This approach is applicable to images of high and lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
210
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 384 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
210
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, as a preprocessing step for guiding a human expert towards a JPEG ghost location, we consider these three classifiers highly suitable. Additionally, the good discrimination for small values of δ improves over the results reported in [5], which reports δ ≥ 20 as a good quality distance for detection. In [7], detection rates for δ ≤ 10 vary between 50% and 70%.…”
Section: Experiments On Individual Image Windowssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, as a preprocessing step for guiding a human expert towards a JPEG ghost location, we consider these three classifiers highly suitable. Additionally, the good discrimination for small values of δ improves over the results reported in [5], which reports δ ≥ 20 as a good quality distance for detection. In [7], detection rates for δ ≤ 10 vary between 50% and 70%.…”
Section: Experiments On Individual Image Windowssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We varied the length w of a window between 8 and 64 pixels. Following [5], we excluded very smooth image regions, i. e. windows with an intensity variance below 5 points. For the training of the classifiers, we used 10% of the images from all three classes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations